A collector bought a painting and then asked me to paint over part of it
A collector bought a large piece in March, a serious one, and then two weeks ago wrote to ask if I'd come paint over the lower left corner because it clashed with a new sofa. I thought it was a joke at first. It wasn't.
I said no, obviously, but the thing that stayed with me is how long I even hesitated. There was a beat where I thought, well, it's sold, it's their wall, maybe there's a conversation here. That beat is the part I don't like about myself. Ten years ago I wouldn't have hesitated for a second.
I'm realising the market has done something to me that I didn't sign up for. The work gets made to be bought, and somewhere along the way the buyer starts to feel like a client and the painting starts to feel like a commission. Object, service, whatever. And then a stranger asks you to un-paint your own painting and part of you runs the calculation.
I told him no, and offered to take it back if he wanted something more neutral. He kept it. But I keep thinking about that hesitation.
Has anyone else noticed the line moving? Not the artistic one, the one between what you make and what you owe after they pay for it.
3
4commentsSaveFollow threadShare
That hesitation isn't the market's fault. It's just the consequence of selling work at all, over and over, until it stops being yours. Every commission does that to you a little. The first one I did I about drove myself crazy arguing with the client over a piece of stone I'd already agreed to sell. That's the deal. Once it's theirs, it's theirs.
But painting over it isn't the same as them hanging it somewhere you wouldn't. That's destroying the thing you made, and it's not theirs to do that. A sofa gets moved. The painting doesn't get to come back.
The fact that you hesitated just means you're honest about the money. Doesn't mean you're corrupt. You said no. That's the part that counts.
I keep coming back to the sofa, honestly. That's the part that gets me. Not that they asked, but that the reason was a sofa. We spend years deciding every square centimetre and then it has to survive a couch.
But I don't fully agree that selling is the whole deal. I've sold plenty and I don't feel that erosion the way you describe, not anymore. What changed for me is that I stopped thinking of the object as the work. The work is the idea, and the print or the painting is a record of it. So when someone buys it, they get the record. They don't get the thing itself, because the thing itself isn't a physical object anyway. Once I'd untangled that, a collector hanging it next to a terrible sofa stopped being my problem. Their wall, their aesthetic, their problem.
Which is maybe exactly where the hesitation you're describing comes from though. If you believe the object is the work, then of course selling it over and over feels like giving pieces of yourself away. I think the market didn't do that to you. I think you did it to yourself, by handing over the only copy.
The sofa. Yes. It's almost perfect, isn't it, how banal that makes it. Not a disagreement about the work, not something urgent in their life, not even a desire to own it differently. Just a couch.
I can see the logic in what you're saying, but I don't think I follow you all the way. If the work is the idea and they've bought the record, then there's nothing to defend, and I should have said yes. But I didn't say yes for a reason I can't fully talk myself out of, and it isn't preciousness about the surface. It's that the thing on their wall isn't a document of the idea. It is the idea, where it has to live. The idea without the painting is just something I said to myself in the studio.
Maybe that's your point and I'm missing it. But I've never quite managed to believe the painting is a record of anything. It's more like the place the thought finally settles.
You're right that it's not the market's fault, not entirely. But I think the market changes where the hesitation lives. Twenty years ago I'd have had the same feeling about a commission and I'd have called it something else, like being reasonable. Now I hear it differently because I've watched how much of the work gets decided in advance by what will move. So when that beat happened, I recognised the sound of it. That's the part that unsettles me, that I knew exactly where it came from.
But your point stands, and I take it. It's theirs to hang, not theirs to erase. The sofa moves. You said it better than I could. The painting doesn't get to come back, and that's the whole argument in one line.