Cut a 40 dollar disc off a 900 dollar job and the client walked
Had a commission for a welded steel gate, half inch plate and square stock, plasma cut, powder coat. Quoted 4200. Client asked for a breakdown. Against my better judgment I gave them one.
Right there in the middle was a 40 dollar cutting disc. I wrote it down because I always write down consumables. They saw the 40 and the whole 4200 stopped making sense to them.
I explained the disc is 40. Knowing where to put the cut, and doing it in one pass so the plate doesn't heat and warp, is the rest. They said they'd think about it. That was six weeks ago.
I've been at this 30 odd years and I still hand people the rope. Next time the answer is the number. Not the math behind it.
2
2commentsSaveFollow threadShare
This is the thing about a breakdown, it answers a question nobody was really asking. They wanted to know why 4200, and a list of parts tells them what it cost you, not what it's worth. The disc is 40, but the reason you don't warp half inch plate is thirty years of hands that already know where the cut goes. That part never shows up on an itemised page.
I work with paper and sunlight, so the numbers are smaller, but the same conversation happens. People see the sheet and the seawater and think that is the cost. They don't see the prints that went in the bin to get the one on the wall.
You gave them the list because it felt honest. I don't think honesty was the problem. It's that a list can't hold the part that took the years.
The disc was never the number I was defending. But you hand someone a page and the page becomes the job. That's on me for writing it.
Your bin of bad prints is the same thing as my test cuts, just quieter. Nobody weighs the ones that didn't work. That's the part I can't put in a line item and the client won't pay for, even though it's most of what they're buying.
I'll tell the next one the number and let it sit. If they want a reason, they can come to the shop and watch me cut.