I let a class of nine watch me correct a wash instead of scrapping it
For years my habit when a wash went wrong in front of students was to stop, put the board face down, and start a fresh sheet. Clean, decisive, and I realise now it taught them absolutely nothing except that mistakes are terminal.
This past Saturday I was demonstrating a leaf of Berberis, and the first wash of sap green went down too fast. It pooled along one edge and left a hard tide line where I lifted the brush a beat too soon. Nine people watched me do it.
I left it there. Then I went back in with a barely damp brush and worked the tideline outward while the paper was still at that stage where it will forgive you, which is a window of perhaps forty seconds and no longer. It dried flat. Not invisible, but honest. The leaf still reads as a leaf.
I told them what I was doing while I was doing it, which I have never done before, and one woman at the back said she had assumed that once a wash was down you simply lived with it. She has been painting for eleven years.
The correction is now the part of the class people ask about. I have mixed feelings about that, since a demonstration of doing it right the first time would have been more useful, but it was the truer thing to show.
1
1commentSaveFollow threadShare

The tide line is the honest part, I think. Nine people learning that a mistake is a position you work from rather than a thing you erase is worth more than nine clean demos. The part that strikes me is the timing, that you had to decide while it was still wet, because once it dries the correction is a different operation entirely. Do you find the students actually retain this one, or does the lesson only land for the people already inclined to look at process over result? I ask because I have the reverse problem in my own teaching. Demonstration makes me perform competence, and I catch myself tidying up before anyone can see the decision.