My watercolor originals sell. The prints are a different story.
Okay so I'm eight months into full-time art and I finally have enough data to be genuinely confused. My original watercolors sell consistently, like every time I post a finished piece it's gone within a day or two. But I got a professional scan done of one of my favorites, ordered a small run of prints to test the waters, and they've just been sitting there. Like barely any movement in three weeks.
And I don't get it because everyone always asks "do you have prints?" when they see the originals. I made them available. Crickets.
My partner says it's because people who buy watercolors want THE thing, the actual one with the paper texture and the wonky edge where my tape was, not a reproduction. And maybe that's true and I should just lean into originals only. But also maybe I priced them wrong or my thumbnails are bad or I'm just not promoting them right.
Mostly I'm annoyed I spent real money on the scan and the test run haha. But it's also kind of nice to know the originals aren't a fluke. Any other artists out there where prints flop but originals move?? Or am I the weird one who should've known better.
2
4commentsSaveFollow threadShare
I've seen this pattern for years, both in my own sales and in students who transition to full-time. The people who buy original watercolors are a specific kind of collector. They want the one-of-a-kind object, the brushwork they can see and sometimes even feel in the paper. A print of a watercolor loses the very thing that makes watercolor special: the transparency, the pooling, the soft edges that only exist on the original sheet.
The people asking about prints are often casual admirers who like the image on a screen but aren't committed buyers. They say "do you have prints?" the way they'd say "that's lovely" at a gallery opening. It's a compliment, not always a purchase intention.
That said, prints can work, but they often need a different audience and a different price point than the one you'd naturally set. They tend to do better at markets or through a shop where people are browsing with a smaller budget in mind, not through the same channels where your originals sell. And a three-week window is very short for prints, honestly. Originals moving in a day is unusual; prints are a slower, steadier game.
I wouldn't read too much into it yet. Give them more time, and if they keep sitting, consider whether the reproduction does the piece justice. Some pieces simply don't translate well to print, and there's no shame in that either.
I think the poster is right to be confused, and I'd add that the gap between the two audiences is even wider than it looks. The people who collect original watercolors are buying the physical object, the sheet itself, the history of your hand on it. A print is an image of that object, and it competes with every other image they could hang on the wall, whether it's yours or not.
What I've seen work, for what it's worth, is treating prints as a separate product with a separate reason to exist. Not "a cheaper version of the original" but something with its own framing, its own limited run, its own story. Presented as a thing in its own right rather than a consolation prize.
But also, three weeks is not much time for prints. Originals sell on the moment; prints sell on the accumulation. Different rhythm entirely.
YES exactly, thank you for putting it into words better than I could. I literally was sitting here like "is it the paper weight? is the ink off? did I overprice them??" and it never once occurred to me that I was trying to sell the same thing twice to the same people.
The "separate product" thing really hit me though. Like of course nobody wants a print of something they could have just... bought the actual painting of. The people who missed the original aren't looking for a souvenir of it, they're looking for something to hang. That's a totally different conversation and I've been having the wrong one the whole time.
Do you frame yours yourself or do you send them flat? That's the part I keep going back and forth on because framing originals is obvious but prints feel like they need a whole different presentation and I have zero idea where to start haha. Honestly I might just be overthinking it. Would love to hear what's actually worked for you.
oh this is so validating honestly. I've been sitting here trying to figure out if I priced the prints wrong or if my scan was bad or something, but what you're saying makes so much sense. the whole appeal of watercolor IS the physicality, the transparency you can only get with light hitting the actual pigment on paper. a print flattens all of that into just... an image.
and the casual admirer thing stings a little but you're right haha. like "do you have prints" is polite interest, not buying interest. different beast entirely.
did you ever find a market for your prints at all, or did you just lean fully into originals? I'm trying to figure out if it's worth keeping the small run around or if I should just let them go and not bother reordering.