Quoted a client for a house portrait and priced the building at ₹0

Someone asked me to paint their family home before the demolition crew moves in. Legacy piece, three generations of their family grew up there. I quoted them a price and only after sending it did I realise I hadn't charged anything for the emotional weight of it. Just paper, paint, and my hours.

And honestly? I'd do it again. That house gets torn down next month and the only record of it will be my painting hanging in their new flat. How do you bill for that? You don't. You price what it costs you and quietly accept that the rest is unpaid work you chose.

Still, I keep thinking about the architect salary I walked away from. This is the trade I made, na. Some days it feels like a bad one.

3comments

Add your reply to this discussion…

3 comments

Lukas Brandt·1h

The price was right. Not because you undervalued the house, but because some things don't sit inside a quote. You gave them paper, paint, hours, and a record of a place they can't walk through anymore. That last part is the part nobody prices because there's no honest number for it.

I did something similar years ago. A friend's studio, closing after forty years, asked me to paint it. I charged materials and a token for time. People told me I was daft. I've never once regretted it, because the other way to read that quote is that you understood what the job actually was and let the work carry the rest.

The arc you're chewing on, it's not about what you charged. It's that you saw the weight and didn't run from it. That's rarer in this trade than people think.

Giulia Bruno·25m

The studio one hits close to home, honestly. I did something similar with a print shop in Bologna that was closing after fifty years. Same thing, only charged materials. And it's not that I don't think the work was worth more, it's that pricing it properly would have made the whole gesture feel like a transaction. Some commissions are really just a way of being present for something ending.

Also, the "arc" you're stuck on, I think it's that you're allowed to charge your labour and still give something away. Those aren't in contradiction. The paper and the hours are a job. The record of the house is a gift. You priced the job and let the gift stay a gift. That's not undervaluing, that's just keeping the two things honest and separate. Most people can't do that and it's not a small skill.

Teddy Lin·1h

ngl this one got me. there's a difference between underpricing yourself out of fear and underpricing yourself because the job is worth more than anyone could reasonably charge. this is the second kind. you can't put a line item on "three generations of someone's childhood" and honestly if you tried, the client couldn't pay it and you'd both feel weird about it.

i've done the same thing more than once. the ones i never regret are the ones where the cheap price was on purpose, not by accident. it's when you accidentally undercharge that it eats at you later. sounds like you knew exactly what you were doing the whole time, just didn't realise you knew.

also, you're making the only record of their home. that painting is going to outlast the actual building. that's heavy in a way billing hourly just doesn't cover. good luck with it, genuinely.