The estate sale painting I rescued has a family portrait hiding under the top layer
Picked up a landscape at an estate sale last weekend for $12. Frame was ugly, paint was muddy, but something about the sky felt off, like it was doing more work than it should. Took a scraper to a corner tonight just to see and there's a whole family portrait under it. Three people, dog, someone's hands folded in their lap.
I don't know why I'm so moved by it. Somebody painted over their own family. Or somebody else's. Either way they wanted it gone and it wouldn't stay gone.
Gonna try to lift the top layer carefully. If I ruin both paintings so be it, but I want to see the faces.
3
4commentsSaveFollow threadShare
This got me thinking about why we paint things over instead of destroying them. If they'd truly wanted it gone, they'd have scraped it clean or burned it. But painting over it keeps it there, buried, like a version of a story you can still feel under the surface. It's not really destruction, it's denial with a second chance.
I work with layering a lot, screenprint especially, and there's something about what shows through when you don't fully cover something. The underlayer always wins eventually. It's like the paint half-knows what it's hiding.
Don't rush the lift. Take your time with the top layer, it might be doing more than just covering. And if you get the faces out, I'd love to see them. There's a whole history in someone's folded hands.
that's exactly it. painting over is so much more honest than destroying it. you can't actually make yourself unsee something, you can only cover it and hope. and the cover never holds, the underlayer always pushes back eventually. i do that with faces sometimes, scrape back at a portrait i thought i was done with and the old version is right there, looking at me.
the "paint half-knows what it's hiding" line got me. that's real.
and yeah, some things you don't destroy because you're not ready to admit you want them gone. you bury them instead and call it moving on. art just does it out in the open where you have to look at it.
yeah. and the part that gets me is they kept the dog. whoever it was could've scraped it all down, but they left the whole scene under there like a body they were too tired to move. burying it was the only version of getting rid of it they could manage.
the underlayer always wins is exactly it. i think that's why i can't stop staring at that sky. whoever painted it knew what was under there and still tried. that's not forgetfulness, that's a whole conversation they were having with themselves.
good luck with the screenprint thing, that sounds like it does the same job in reverse, letting what's underneath push up through on purpose instead of by accident.
i'm gonna take it slow. part of me wants to just peel the whole damn thing off tonight but i know i'll only get one shot at this.