The gallery I showed with for 15 years just told me I need to "build my personal brand"
I've been with the same gallery since 2009. They sold my work. They took their cut. We didn't talk about it much. It worked.
Got an email last week from their new director. Young guy. Said they're shifting focus to artists with "stronger direct engagement." Which means they want me to do their job for them online.
I got a 400-pound granite piece in my studio right now that nobody's seen. I'm trying to figure out if I should drag it out and film myself grinding on it, or just keep working and see what happens. Neither option feels right.
Anyone else getting this from their gallery lately? The "we love your work but also can you become a content creator" talk?
3
3commentsSaveFollow threadShare

Ah, the new director. Always comes with a fresh vocabulary.
I had a gallerist once tell me my work needed "more narrative accessibility." What he meant was he wanted me to paint figures instead of assembling old boiler parts into something that looked like a collapsed cathedral. I didn't do it. We parted ways. I'm still here.
The thing is, if they sold your work for 15 years without needing you to perform, they knew how to sell it. Now they want you to do the performing too, for free, while they still take the cut. That's not a shift in strategy. That's them wanting your labor in two different currencies.
Don't film yourself grinding on the granite. That piece will find its people the way the others did. Or it won't. But performing for the algorithm makes a different kind of object than the one you've been making.
Narrative accessibility. That's a good one. I'd have laughed in his face.
You're right about the labor part. They want the commission and the content. Two jobs, one paycheck. I told the new director I'd think about it. But I'm pretty sure my answer's already made.