the gallery that loved my work but asked me to change the medium

A gallery contacted me last year, really interested, came to the studio, said all the right things about the work. Then the email: "Would you consider working in acrylic instead of oil? It would ship easier and sell better."

I said no. Maybe that was stupid. But oil is what I do, the way it moves, the drying time, the glazing, it's not a preference, it's the whole practice. I don't know how to say what I want to say in acrylic.

Has a gallery ever asked you to change your materials or your style to fit them? Did you bend or did you walk? I'm curious where the line is for other people.

6comments

Add your reply to this discussion…

6 comments

Mira Vey·1w

i think you were right to say no. not because there's anything wrong with acrylic, but because they basically asked you to make different work. that's not a logistical request, that's a creative one dressed up in practical clothes.

a friend of mine had a gallery tell her they loved her sculptures but could she do them in bronze instead of found objects. she tried. hated the whole process, hated the results, and the work lost what made it hers. took her years to get back to what she actually wanted to make.

the shipping and selling argument is their problem to solve, not yours. there are galleries that figure out how to move oil paintings every day.

Niall Doherty·1w

ah the bronze thing, that's heartbreaking. you can see exactly how it happens too, gallery comes in all excited, you're buzzing, and then the ask sounds reasonable at first. you tell yourself it's just the material, the idea's the same. but it's not, is it. the material is half the thinking.

i had a fella once, years ago, wanted me to do a linocut of his dog but in colour. said he'd pay double. and i was skint, like, properly skint, and i still said no because i don't work in colour, that's not my lane. and he couldn't understand it, sure isn't it just the same picture but with more inks. and i couldn't explain that the whole thing, the whole language of it, changes when you add another block. it's not the same picture with paint slapped on, it's a different animal entirely.

your friend took years to get back to herself. that's the bit. you don't always get those years back.

you were right to say no. the shipping and selling, sure that's their end of the stick, they can sort their own logistics. grand.

Camille LaurentOP·1w

The linocut dog in colour. That's a special kind of cluelessness, isn't it. "Same picture but with more inks", as if that's not a completely different language. Did he think you were being difficult or did he actually hear you when you explained it?

Camille LaurentOP·1w

The friend who tried bronze, that hits. It's exactly what I was afraid of. You spend years learning how to say something in a material and someone asks you to translate it into something that doesn't speak your language. The results are dead on arrival.

And you're right about the shipping. It's their job to figure out logistics, not mine to change my practice so their margins look better. I needed to hear that.

Margaret Hsu·1w

I don't think that was stupid at all. I work in watercolour, which is similarly tied to a particular way of working, the transparency, the paper, the fact that you can't force it. If someone asked me to switch to gouache or acrylic so the work would ship flat or photograph more vividly, they'd be asking me to make different paintings entirely, not just to use different materials.

There's a common assumption outside the practice that medium is interchangeable, like choosing between pen and pencil. It isn't. The way oil behaves, the working time, the layering, the particular quality of light you can achieve through glazing, that shapes what you can say. Asking you to give that up for ease of shipping is asking you to compromise the work at its foundation.

I've had to push back on framing choices and presentation preferences over the years, but never medium. I think you made the right call. The right gallery will want your work, not a more convenient version of it.

Camille LaurentOP·1w

Exactly. The transparency, the paper, the fact that you can't force it, that's the whole thing, isn't it. Watercolour is its own discipline, you can't just swap it out like changing a filter. People who don't work with their hands don't understand that the material is the thought, not the packaging for it.