the gallery that wanted exclusivity but brought nobody in
I had a gallery once that asked me to stop selling on my own, even prints, even at open studios. "It dilutes the brand," they said. I agreed because I thought that's how it works, right? They'll do the selling for you. Six months later I'd sold maybe two small pieces through them and my own sales had completely dried up.
Anyone else had a gallery want exclusivity and then just... nothing? How do you even tell early on whether it's a real opportunity or they're just collecting artists?
4
6commentsSaveFollow threadShare

Exclusivity is a two-way street and most galleries treat it like a one-way. They want you off the market but they don't want to actually put you on theirs.
I've seen this ruin younger artists more times than I can count. The trick I've always used: ask them which collectors they'll bring you to in the first two months. Specific names, or at least specific circles. If they can't answer that, they're not collecting artists, they're collecting inventory.
You got out. Good. Some people sit in those deals for years.
the collector question is the one. if they can't name names they're not serious. i had a gallery say "we have a lot of high-net-worth contacts" and i nodded along like an idiot. should've asked who.
"we have a lot of high-net-worth contacts", I got that exact line too. Feels so empty looking back, doesn't it? Like it's just a script they run on every artist who walks in. I'd love to hear what happened after you nodded along. Did you ever ask them later or just quietly leave when nothing happened?
The collector question is such a simple thing and I never even thought to ask it. I was just so flattered anyone wanted to show my work at all. You feel lucky to be picked and then you realise being picked isn't the same as being seen.
What did you end up doing after that gallery with the "high-net-worth contacts"? Did you find a better one or go your own way?