What's the weirdest way you've ever gotten a gallery's attention?

ok real question. everyone talks about the polite email, the cold open call, the submission portal that eats your soul. but has anyone ever gotten in somewhere sideways?

i'll go first. i got my first group show because i was standing in the gallery trying to decide if i even wanted to submit and the owner came out and asked if i needed help. i was so flustered i just pointed at a piece on the wall and said "i could make that better." absolute foot in mouth. she laughed, told me to prove it, and i brought something in two days later. still don't know if that was confidence or sheer stupidity but it worked.

so what's yours? walked in with a piece under your arm? slid into their DMs? emailed so many times they finally answered just to shut you up?

6comments

Add your reply to this discussion…

6 comments

Ramesh Jha·1h

This is a funny story ji, and it made me smile because it is so much like our line of work. I am a Mithila painter, and in our tradition we never go and ask a gallery for anything directly. We work through cooperatives, and it is the cooperative that speaks for us. But I remember once, many years back, a lady from Delhi who runs a craft fair saw one of my pieces hanging at a neighbour's house and came asking who made it. I was not even there at the time, my wife had to call me. I arrived in a hurry, still dusty from the field, and she looked at the painting with her spectacles and said, "This is fine work, but the border line is not steady." I was so taken aback I said, "Madam, show me one steady line in all of nature and I will match it." She laughed also, just like your gallery owner did, and she gave me a stall at the fair that year.

So I think you are right that it is not the pitch that works, it is the nerve. But I would add one thing. In our tradition, confidence is not the same as ego. When I said that to her, I meant it with respect for the work itself, not pride in myself. Maybe that is why she laughed and not frowned.

Teddy Lin·20m

ok wait this is my favorite reply in this whole thread. the dusty-from-the-field detail is cinema, i'm picturing a whole film. and honestly the fact that your work spoke for you while you weren't even in the room is the most humbling flex. some of us are out here doing foot-in-mouth tricks at the front desk and you just... had your painting do the job from across town lol. that woman must've known what she was looking at before she ever asked for you.

Mira VeyOP·2m

ha, "had my painting do the job from across town", i'm gonna frame that. though in my case the painting wasn't doing much of anything, it was just sitting there being better than whatever was on the wall. the bar was low, let's be honest.

but yeah, the foot-in-mouth thing... there's something to it. all the polished pitches get tuned out. saying something stupid at least proves you're not reading from a script. that's half the battle with galleries honestly, just not seeming like everyone else.

Mira VeyOP·12m

that story is better than mine, honestly. showed up dusty from the field and the painting did all the talking. that's the whole thing isn't it, we spend so much time trying to say the right thing and the work just sits there being true.

and the cooperative thing, i respect that a lot. the gallery circuit here makes everyone beg for the same five minutes of attention. having a system where your community vouches instead of you having to sell yourself, that sounds like a better way to work. how'd it end up, did she buy it?

Giulia Bruno·1h

That's genuinely great, honestly. The foot-in-mouth thing works because it's not a pitch, it's a dare. Galleries get pitched at all day, every day, in every format. But "I could make that better", nobody says that to an owner's face unless they actually mean it. She could smell the difference.

I've never done anything that bold. My weirdest one was the opposite, I got a residency slot because I spent an entire opening staring at one print for so long that the curator assumed I was either the artist or a collector, came over to talk, and by the time we realized I was neither, we were already deep in conversation about editioning. I think the prolonged staring read as serious engagement and she liked that more than my work, at least initially. Which is slightly humiliating to admit. But it worked.

I do think there's something to the sideways route. It bypasses the whole careful self-presentation thing where everyone sounds exactly the same. Confidence or stupidity is a blurry line in this field anyway.

Mira VeyOP·1h

ha, that's a good one too. staring someone down long enough they mistake you for the art is a flex, honestly. and the part about being neither is the best part, you got in on the confusion and then just... stayed? what happened after they figured it out, did you come clean or ride it?