Search

A gallery I was in conversation with last year asked for exclusive representation of every single piece I produce, including work they would never exhibit or sell, studies, private commissions, teaching demonstration pieces. I told them no, and the conversation ended rather quickly. Has anyone else run into this kind of exclusivity clause? Where do you draw the line? I understand a gallery wanting commitment on what they show, but ownership of everything that leaves your brush seems a step too far to me.

just got offered representation from a gallery that i've admired for ages. feels huge. but then they hit me with the 'artist pays for framing' clause. i've never encountered that. what's the weirdest or most surprising thing you've been asked to pay for by a gallery, or a condition that just made you go 'huh?' mine's the framing, obvs. feels like a bit of a red flag, no?

A gallery about an hour from me offered representation last year on condition of exclusivity within a fifty-mile radius. I turned it down. It felt too limiting for a first relationship, and I wasn't convinced they could sell enough of my work to make it sensible. I still wonder whether that was the right call. Has anyone here signed an exclusive agreement with a gallery and found it worked well? Or regretted it? I would be interested to hear how you decided.

My first real gallery took a 50% cut and I was so relieved to have the representation I didn't question it. Then I realised they weren't doing much beyond hanging the work and cashing the cheque. No marketing, no collector outreach, no press. I was bringing them my own audience. I've heard worse. A friend's gallery took 40% and then asked him to pay for the wine at his opening. So what's the worst deal you ever took, or nearly took, just because you wanted a gallery to say yes? And when did you finally walk?

I keep thinking about a contract I was offered years ago from a small gallery. It asked for 50% commission, exclusive representation within 200 miles, first refusal on everything I produced for two years, and the right to reproduce my work for their promotional use in perpetuity. I did not sign it. The owner seemed genuinely surprised. What is the worst contract term you have been presented with, and did you walk away or negotiate?

Had a gallery offer representation but wanted me to front the cost of their promotional materials. Anyone else run into this? Seemed off to me.

A question I keep turning over, because I have done both and come to a firm conclusion. Early on I did the walk-in. A small gallery in a town I was passing through, a folder of mounted sheets, and the owner was perfectly kind and entirely uninterested. Nothing came of it, and I spent the rest of the afternoon annoyed at myself rather than at him. Since then I have sent a short, careful email with three images and a link, and let the work wait. Two of my three representation enquiries that went anywhere began that way. I also keep the folder ready on the off chance. That is not the same as marching in with it. The reason I ask is that there is a certain kind of advice floating about that insists on the personal touch, that the walk-in shows initiative, and I have never once seen it work in the way people claim. I would happily be told I am wrong. Perhaps it depends on the sort of gallery. So: which one do you do, and what did it actually get you? I am more interested in the failures than the successes, if I am honest.

I had a gallery offer me representation once with terms I knew were off. 60/40 in their favour, exclusive for three years, no mention of how we'd handle shows or promotion. I signed anyway because it was my first real one and I wanted it to be real. Cost me two years and a fair bit of money to get out of it. I've learned since to trust the feeling in the room. If the person across the table can't answer a simple question about how they sell work, that's the answer. What's the red flag you saw early and pushed past anyway, and did it cost you or did it work out?

I've heard so many stories about the struggle to get representation, which is real, bof. But I'm curious about what happens after. What's the strangest or most unexpected thing that happened once a gallery actually agreed to show your work? Was it a difficult client, a weird promotion, something totally bizarre? Tell me something that happened after the 'yes'. For me, it was being asked to paint a portrait of the owner's poodle for their birthday. C'est ça.