Charged a collector €900 for a painting I'd been working on for 22 hours and still felt guilty

A collector came to the studio last month, saw an interior I'd finished weeks earlier, wanted it. I named my price, nine hundred euros, which for me is honest but not bold. They said yes immediately. And instead of relief I felt guilty, like I'd overcharged, like I should have said eight hundred if I was being fair.

Sit with that for a second. I'm doing a thing I've trained twenty-five years to do, at a price that nets out to about forty euros an hour before materials and studio costs, and the guilt lives in me because they didn't flinch.

I keep a ledger of every finished painting, hours, materials, price. It's brutal reading. Nine hundred sounds like real money to people who don't know the hours don't end when I stop painting. The stretching, the varnishing, the framing, the emails, the schlepping. Everyone who pays for the painting pays for approximately one painting's worth of unpaid work around it.

I know what the actual answer is. Raise prices until the flinch comes from the other direction. I've added maybe ten percent in three years. I'm scared of the ceiling because I don't know where it is, and the collector who says yes too fast terrifies me more than the one who negotiates.

Anyway the painting is gone now and the guilt faded. But I keep thinking about what it would feel like to name a price and not apologise internally for it.

4comments

Add your reply to this discussion…

4 comments

Mateo Serrano·2h

I felt this hard. I sell pieces for a fraction of what they cost me in hours and I still catch myself apologizing when someone says yes too fast. Like their enthusiasm is proof I got it wrong somehow.

But you said it yourself: twenty-five years of training, forty an hour before expenses. That's not overcharging, that's undercharging with a guilty conscience. I had a mentor tell me once that the guilt goes away when you start pricing for the person who'll own it long after you forget you made it. Nine hundred euros for something they'll live with for decades? They got the good end.

Also, weirdly, the fact that they didn't flinch is the market telling you something. Listen to it.

Camille LaurentOP·2h

Your mentor's right, and I know it, and still the guilt shows up anyway. Twenty-five years of training and my hand shakes when someone accepts my price without bargaining. It's absurd. I think part of me still believes the work should cost what it cost me to make, not what it's worth to them. Those are two different numbers and I've never fully made peace with that.

"Pricing for the person who'll own it long after you forget you made it", that's a good way to hold it. I'll try to remember that next time someone says yes too fast.

You said something got cut off there, "weir...", what were you going to say?

Inês Costa·2h

The guilt is so familiar it almost doesn't surprise me anymore. I charge a few hundred euros for a cyanotype that took days of preparing paper, waiting for the right light, developing in seawater I carried up from the beach. And when someone says yes without hesitation I feel the same small shame, like I've somehow tricked them.

I think it's because we still think of this as a favour we're doing, not a skill. My father was a fisherman, and we ate what he caught, and the sea never sent him an invoice. So putting a number on something made with your hands and your patience feels like a betrayal of the thing itself.

But it isn't. Forty euros an hour for twenty-five years of knowing what you're doing is not greed. It's the opposite of greed. The collector didn't flinch because they understood exactly what they were buying. Maybe let their certainty be the thing you trust instead of your guilt.

Camille LaurentOP·1h

The seawater thing got me. You carried the ocean up the beach to develop a print, and you're the one feeling guilty. It's backwards in a way I can't quite get over.

"My father was a fisherman, and we ate what he caught, and the sea never sent him an invoice." That's it exactly. The sea gives and you take and nobody counts. But a painting isn't the sea and it isn't fish, it's time with a number on it, and somewhere we learned that putting that number there is the part that's shameful instead of the part that's honest.

Your mentor's right and so is mine, and the hand still shakes anyway. Maybe the guilt is just the tax we pay for doing this work at all. I've stopped trying to argue it away. I just count it into the price now. Nine hundred plus one small shame, voilà.