My cutting mat is a map of every bad decision I've made this month
People keep posting clean studio shots and I'm over here with a self-healing mat that stopped healing somewhere around 2019. The cuts are so deep now the blade catches in the old grooves and drags. I know it's time to replace it. I've known for a year. Instead I just rotate the paper 90 degrees and cut around the damage, which is ridiculous because the whole point of the mat was that I didn't have to think about it.
There's something almost archaeological about it though. I can trace the exact week I was fighting with a series, the parallel scoring marks where I kept re-cutting the same line because I couldn't get it straight, the angry single gouge from the one time I pushed too hard on a wet day. My practice is supposed to be slow and careful and the mat says otherwise.
I'll buy a new one next week. I won't throw this one out though. I'll keep it behind the bench and use it for the messy jobs, the ones where precision doesn't matter. Which means in six months the new mat will be pristine and this one will have absorbed every mistake. Honestly that feels like a fair division of labour.
3
4commentsSaveFollow threadShare
The rotating the paper 90 degrees thing is so painfully familiar. I did the same with a screen that had a nick in it for months, just printing around the flaw like it was a design choice.
But honestly the archaeological part is real and I think it's worth more than a clean mat. I read somewhere about how printmakers used to date their editions by the scratches and wear on the plate itself, because every state leaves its trace. Your mat is basically that. It's a record of labor. The clean studio shot is the lie, the mat is the truth.
That said, when the blade starts catching you're not just fighting the work anymore, you're fighting the tool, and that's when it stops being romantic and starts being stupid. Replace it. But maybe photograph the old one first. That grid of damage is a better document of your month than any sketchbook page.
The plate dating is right but I'll give you the darker version. The mat is archaeology of the second order. The plate records the mark you meant to make. The mat records everything you did while trying to make it, all the false starts and the rage-scoring on the same line because you knew it was wrong and did it anyway. That's the part nobody frames.
Still, when the blade starts pulling you off your line, that's not memory anymore, that's the past steering your hand. You lose the fight and you don't even know it's the mat doing it. Get a new one. Keep the old one hung on the wall somewhere if you need the record. Both things can be true at once.
Second order archaeology, that's exactly it. I keep the plates neat because they're the work. The mat is where the actual labour happened, and it's a mess. Nobody prints the mess.
You're right about the steering though. I've been blaming myself for a line that's been wandering for months and it's just the mat pulling. Rage-scoring a line you know is wrong and doing it anyway... I feel seen in a way I didn't ask for.
Might frame it actually. Not as art, just as evidence. Put it up in the studio where I can see it and remember the new one is not supposed to look like that.
The screen nick thing is a good parallel. I do almost the same with paper actually, cutting around a stain or a weak spot like it's a feature, when really I just can't bear to waste the sheet. There's a line between working with the material and just being stubborn.
I like the plate dating thing though. I work in a conservation studio and I'm around old prints all day, and you're right, the wear is part of the record. Nobody signs the clean proof with more pride than the worn one.
That said, I cut my thumb last week on a piece of the mat that had split, so the archaeology and I may be parting ways soon. Some records end in a skip bin.