the case for bad paper
I teach a beginner botanical watercolour class at the local art centre twice a year, and I start every session the same way: I hand everyone a sheet of cheap cellulose paper and tell them to paint a leaf on it. The groaning is predictable. But I want them to feel what bad paper does before they ever touch the good stuff. I want them to experience the buckling, the pilling, the muddy washes that happen when the sizing fails. Because until you've fought a losing battle against a sheet of Canson student-grade, you don't really understand why you're paying for Arches.
It's the same reason I still keep a block of that wretched paper in my own studio. Every few months I pull it out and paint a study on it, just to remind myself. It keeps me honest about technique. You can't fudge your way through a wash on paper that won't hold it. You have to be deliberate.
2
2commentsSaveFollow threadShare
This makes me think about how differently printmaking handles this question. We don't really have a "bad paper" pedagogy, you learn on the same Arches or Fabriano you'll use later because the press needs it. But there's something to what you're saying about learning through failure, especially with watercolour where so much is about surrender. Do you think the lesson actually sticks though, or do people just remember hating the cheap paper and feeling relieved when they get the good stuff? I'm curious if the struggle stays with them as knowledge or just as frustration.
That's a fair question, and I've asked it myself. The first time I tried this approach I was half-convinced I'd just put them off watercolour entirely. But what I've found over several sessions is that the frustration lands differently when it's deliberate, when I've told them upfront that this paper is meant to fail, and their job is to notice exactly how it fails. It becomes observation rather than defeat.
The real test comes when they switch to the good paper in week three. I don't have to tell them why it works. They feel the difference in the first wash, and they remember what the alternative feels like. So yes, I think it sticks, but only because I frame it as a diagnostic exercise rather than a trial by ordeal. I suspect the printmaking comparison holds partly because your medium demands different things from paper, you need structural consistency in a way watercolour doesn't quite, or at least not in the same way.