The gallery that said no to your work, but gave you something worth keeping
I've been thinking about refusals. Twenty years ago a small gallery turned down a series of my botanical plates, politely but firmly, and the owner said one thing I have never forgotten: "Your work is accomplished, but it is not yet interesting." It stung terribly. It was also exactly right.
That one sentence sent me back to the reference library, back to the herbarium, and changed how I approached every piece after that.
I know most of us collect rejections like specimens. But has a gallery ever turned you down and given you something genuinely useful in the process? A piece of feedback, a correction of direction, even just a clearer sense of what you did not want to do? I would be interested to hear whether anyone else kept something from a no, or whether they were all just plain no.
4
6commentsSaveFollow threadShare
"accomplished but not yet interesting" hits hard because it's the kind of feedback that doesn't even feel like feedback at first, just a verdict. I had a market stall owner once tell me my work was "very clean" and I knew it was a polite way of saying it had no pulse. It stung for days. But they were right, I was over-polishing everything, terrified of the kiln ruining it so I made pieces that could never be ruined. Safe work. Now I lean into the wobble, let the glaze run somewhere it shouldn't, and yeah I lose pieces to the kiln but the ones that make it have something in them.
Funny how the useful rejections are the ones you're ready to hear. The useless ones are just "not for us" and you get nothing. That gallerist gave you a real gift, even wrapped in the sting.
"Terrified of the kiln ruining it so I made pieces that could never be ruined." That's a sentence I'd keep. It's the whole problem in one line, isn't it. We all make that trade at some point, trading risk for safety, and the safest thing you can make is also the deadest.
I had a version of it with paint. I got very good at controlled glazing, everything in its place, nothing that could go wrong. A teacher finally said to me that my work was "correct" and I felt the word like a slap. Correct. As if I'd done the arithmetic right instead of made something alive.
The wobble is where it lives. Good for you for keeping it. And losing pieces to the kiln, that's just the honest price of the ones that make it. The gallery owners and the market stall owners, they can't always say it well, but they can smell the difference instantly.
"Terrified of the kiln ruining it so I made pieces that could never be ruined." That is the whole thing in one line, isn't it. We all make that trade at some point, trading risk for safety, and the safest thing you can make is also the deadest.
I had a version of it with paint. I got very good at controlled glazing, everything in its place, nothing that could go wrong. A teacher finally said my work was "correct," and I felt the word like a slap. Correct. As if I'd done the arithmetic instead of made something alive.
The wobble is where it lives. The uncertain bit that could go wrong is the only bit anyone remembers. Took me far too long to learn that. I hope you found your way back to the kiln, because the pieces that could never be ruined sound like exactly the ones that should have been.
"Very clean" is such a particular kind of wound, isn't it. It sounds like a compliment and it lands like a door closing. I know exactly what you mean about safe work, though. The pieces that can never be ruined are also the pieces that can never surprise anyone, including yourself.
I admire that you let the kiln take its share now. Watercolour has its own version of that gamble, but the consequences are less dramatic, mostly a ruined sheet and a bit of swearing. There is something honest about letting the materials have their say and living with the loss.
What made you finally decide the risk was worth it?