Search

A gallery once looked at my botanical work and suggested, very kindly, that I might "loosen up", that my illustrations were too precise, too studied, and that collectors preferred something more gestural. I thanked them, shook hands, and never called again. My accuracy is the entire point of the work. I did not take the suggestion. I have my own war stories, but I'd rather hear yours. What is the worst piece of feedback a gallery has ever given you about your work? The kind that made you wonder whether they'd looked at your work at all, or whether they just wanted someone else's paintings with your signature on them. I suspect we all have at least one.

I'll go first. A gallery in Warsaw turned me down years ago and just said "your colours are muddy, you're afraid of the dark tones." I was offended for a week. Then I looked at my pastels and... yeah. She was right. I've pushed my darks way further since and it's the biggest change in my work. So what about you, what rejection or harsh word turned out to be the thing you needed to hear? Or did one ever just flatten you and stay unfair?

I've been thinking about refusals. Twenty years ago a small gallery turned down a series of my botanical plates, politely but firmly, and the owner said one thing I have never forgotten: "Your work is accomplished, but it is not yet interesting." It stung terribly. It was also exactly right. That one sentence sent me back to the reference library, back to the herbarium, and changed how I approached every piece after that. I know most of us collect rejections like specimens. But has a gallery ever turned you down and given you something genuinely useful in the process? A piece of feedback, a correction of direction, even just a clearer sense of what you did not want to do? I would be interested to hear whether anyone else kept something from a no, or whether they were all just plain no.

I went to this gallery in a different city last year, showed them my portfolio, old Bangalore houses, chai stalls, morning light in a certain neighbourhood. And the gallerist looks at me and goes, "This is lovely, but can you make it look more Indian?" I didn't even know what to say. I paint what I see every day. What does "more Indian" even mean? She wanted bright Bollywood colours and lotuses or something, I think. Anyway I didn't take it further obviously. But it stuck with me, that assumption that your work needs to perform some idea of where you're from, rather than just being honest about what you actually see and paint. Anyone else ever been asked to "look more" like something? Or the opposite, told you're too X and should tone it down? What's the weirdest feedback a gallerist has given you about your identity or subject matter?

ever had a gallery walkthrough where the owner spent the whole time talking about how they'd want you to frame things differently, hang things differently, basically make different work? i had one last year where the guy kept touching a piece and saying "i'd crop this" every time. i stood there nodding for 45 minutes and left feeling like i'd shown up in the wrong clothes. i still think about it and i still don't know if i should've pushed back or if that's just how it goes. what's the worst gallery feedback you ever took and wished you hadn't?

So here's something I've been chewing on. I had a gallery reach out, small, reputable, good space, and they were interested in a few pieces for a group show. But then came the feedback. "Can you make this a bit warmer?" "The composition on this one feels crowded." "Maybe try a larger format." And I sat there thinking, is this normal curation or am I being moulded into something I didn't sign up for? Because on one hand, they know their space and their buyers. On the other hand, these are my paintings, you know? I already finished them. I ended up doing some of what they asked and standing firm on others. Mixed feelings about it still. Have any of you had a gallery ask for changes before accepting work? Did you do it, negotiate, or just say sorry and move on? I want to know where the line is.

Had a gallery reach out to me recently, or rather, someone claiming to scout for one. Seemed excited, asked for my portfolio, then came back with a list of things I should change before they could "consider" showing the work. Make the palette warmer. Fewer buildings, more people. Can I add more "local flavour", their words. I didn't know whether to laugh or be offended. You haven't even seen the work in person and you already want me to be someone else? Anyway I politely declined. But it got me thinking, has anyone else had a gallery approach you and then immediately start asking for changes before they've even taken the work? Where do you draw the line between feedback and them wanting you to fit a mould?