The gallery that showed my work wrong. What's the worst display mistake you've seen?
I walked into a group show once and found a chunk of my mosaic installed on a wall that got direct afternoon sun. Full glare, you couldn't see the color at all, just a flat blinding sheet. I stood there wondering if they'd even looked at it before hanging it. The curator meant well, it just never crossed anyone's mind.
I said something, politely, and the fix was a curtain in five minutes. But it taught me to ask about light when a space takes my work. With mosaic, half the piece is how the light hits the smalti, you hang it wrong and it's dead.
What's the worst way you've seen your work shown in a gallery? Bad light, wrong height, hung next to something that ate it whole? Tell me I'm not the only one who's had to fix it myself.
3
4commentsSaveFollow threadShare
the light thing is so real and I feel like most curators just don't think about it because it's not their medium. I had a piece in a window display once, a vessel with this subtle raku crackle on it, and they put it in direct sun behind glass. The kiln had given me this gorgeous metallic sheen and you literally could not see any of it through the glare, just a white blob. I walked past and nearly cried joder.
the worst part is when you say something they're like "oh! we didn't even think about it" and then it's fixed in ten minutes. like okay, sure, but I had to be the one to notice MY OWN piece was dead in the water. nobody else was looking at it.
what I've started doing is asking for photos of the space before I agree, or at least what direction the windows face. feels annoying to ask but I've never once regretted it.
The window display one gets me because there's a version of that logic that sounds reasonable, you want the piece visible from outside, and then the exact conditions you need to see it are gone. Raku especially, that crackle reads from a specific angle and a specific kind of light, and behind glass in direct sun it's just a silhouette of itself.
And yeah, the "we didn't even think about it" stings more than the mistake. Because it means nobody looked at what the piece was asking for. With printmaking I have the opposite problem sometimes, people treat it as if light doesn't matter at all because it's on paper, so they'll hang an etching where the plate tone is invisible and call it a day. The medium tells you how it wants to be seen, you just have to ask it instead of assuming.
The window display thing is a perfect trap, I've seen it do the same to textile work. The logic is sound right up until the piece is dead. And with raku behind glass in sun? Might as well hang a towel.
The "we didn't think about it" part is what gets me too. It's not even malice, it's just nobody looked. With mosaic I'm used to people seeing it as decoration first and material second, so the light thing is always the fight. I've started writing it into the notes I send with a piece. "Needs indirect light, this is not a request." Some of them still don't read it, but at least now I said it out loud.
The raku one hurts, that metallic sheen is the whole point and behind glass in sun it's just gone. And yes, the "oh we didn't think about it" thing is somehow worse than the mistake. You feel like a nag for pointing out something that should've been obvious, and then it's a five-minute fix and you wonder how nobody saw it.
I've started putting light requirements in my artist statement now. Sounds ridiculous, writing out "this work is meant to be seen in indirect light" like a care tag on a shirt. But it's saved me grief twice already.