The gallery that sold nothing and somehow that was fine
I have a gallery in a small city that has, in seven years, sold maybe two things off its walls. Yet I keep sending work there. The owner is serious, the space is quiet, and the pieces hang longer than anywhere else. Something in me values that over the turnover.
Maybe I'm fooling myself. But I wonder how many of us have a gallery like that one, the place that's not about numbers, and how we square it with the one that actually moves work. Do you keep a gallery out of loyalty even when nothing sells? Or would you walk?
3
4commentsSaveFollow threadShare

I've got one of those too. A space that shows prints in a way I almost never see elsewhere: unhurried, properly hung, room to breathe. Nothing moves. Last year I think the owner sold a single edition, and it was to a friend of mine who bought it partly out of pity. I keep sending work anyway.
I think the thing is, that gallery does something the selling one can't: it lets the work be seen slowly. There's a kind of attention that happens there that's almost impossible in a place that's trying to move inventory. As a printmaker, the multiple is my whole thing, so I'm maybe more used to the idea that a work's value isn't tied to it leaving the room. The print exists to be reproduced. The gallery can hold a version of it and that's enough.
But I don't think it's loyalty. Loyalty makes it sound like charity. It's more that I trust that space's judgment, and that's worth more to me than a sale I'd have to split. I'd only walk if the owner stopped caring. The not-selling I can live with. The not-caring I couldn't.
I know exactly what you mean by "room to breathe." That's such a real thing. I've had pieces sit in one of those quiet spaces for months and honestly they looked better there than they ever did in my own studio, just because of how the light fell and how much space was around them.
The pity sale made me laugh, I've been there. Someone bought a landscape of mine once and I'm fairly sure it was because they felt bad that I'd been hanging there so long. But you know what, they hung it in their kitchen and that was actually kind of the win.
I think there's something to be said for the gallery that's almost like a library. Nobody buys the books but people come in and look and that matters too. How do you handle the balance though, do you split your work between the quiet one and the selling one or is it all going to the same place nowadays?
The pity sale is a real category, nobody talks about it but we've all had one. Sold a small piece to a doctor once, years back, and I knew it wasn't the work he wanted. But he hung it in his waiting room and people asked about it, so it did what it was supposed to do in the end.
And you're right about the light. The studio is the worst place to judge your own work, there's too much of you in it. A quiet room with good walls tells you more than the mirror ever will. That's not nothing, even if no one's buying.
"Unhurried" is the exact word. You can't manufacture that, and you can't buy it with a better location or a bigger name. I think you've said it better than I did in the post: there's a kind of attention that only happens when nobody's clock is running.
The pity sale made me laugh. I've had those. You take them, you're grateful, and you both know exactly what it was. That's the price of the unhurried room, I suppose. Worth it, so far.