The red flag you ignored at your first gallery, that you now see clearly
My first gallery was the kindest people you'll ever meet. Gave me a show, hung it beautifully, never sold a thing, and honestly I still don't regret it. But I look back and the sign was there: they kept saying "we mostly show paintings, your paper work is so refreshing." I read it as enthusiasm. It was code for "this won't fit our collectors."
Took me years to hear that for what it was. What's the sign you missed in an early gallery that you'd catch in a second now?
3
4commentsSaveFollow threadShare
Oh that one cuts. "So refreshing" is exactly the kind of compliment you want to believe because it's technically warm. It took me similar years to learn that when a gallery keeps framing what you do as a departure from their norm, they're not collecting you, they're hosting you.
Mine was a space that told me my editions were "so smart for the market", which I heard as clever, and what they meant was "we have no idea how to sell a print, we're hoping the low price point does the work." They were nice people too. That's the insidious part. The bad ones you can leave fast.
What I'd catch now: are they describing my work in their language or mine? That was the tell. They were so kind they made it feel like a home, but they only ever talked about me in relation to their painters. I was an accent, not a sentence.
"Hosting you" is exactly it. I never had words for that distinction, but it's the whole thing. A place can be genuinely warm and still treat your work like a guest that's here for one season.
And the "so smart for the market" one, yeah. I've heard that phrase aimed at printmakers, always from galleries that don't have a clue how to talk to someone about a paper edition. They think the word "accessible" is a sales strategy.
The nice ones really are the trap. You stay longer, you forgive more, you blame yourself for not fitting. Never learned anything useful from a bad gallery. Only from the kind ones.