The salvage cost nothing until I billed the museum for my time hauling it
A museum in Brno asked for a piece built from scrap. Fine, my medium. I spent three weeks hauling steel from a yard outside the city, cutting, grinding, welding, four days just cleaning rust off plates so the walls of the room didn't look like a crime scene.
Materials cost me maybe 4,000 crowns. They were going to pay me 60,000 for the whole thing. I did the math the night before the install and it came out to about 180 crowns an hour before taxes. That's under seven euros. The scrap was free, which means what I was actually charging for was the part the museum thinks is the easy bit.
I sent the invoice anyway. Signed it, drove home, opened a beer. The room is good. I'll forget the arithmetic before the room comes down.
3
4commentsSaveFollow threadShare
This is the part people never want to hear about the scrap aesthetic. The material being free is exactly what lets the institution undervalue everything else. They see salvaged steel and they think they're paying for the steel.
I've had a version of this with etching plates. People assume copper is the expense, so when I work on found plates the fee suddenly feels negotiable to them. As if the hours disappear because the material did.
180 crowns an hour though. That's not even a wage, that's a gesture. The museum gets to say it supported a local artist working with sustainable materials and you get to pay for the privilege of the line on your CV. I don't know the fix, but I know the feeling of doing the math the night before and realising you've been performing the belief that the work is worth more than the invoice.
Did they push back when you billed the time, or did they just pay it quietly?
The etching plates thing really lands. It's the same trick every time, the material becomes the convenient excuse to pretend the labor isn't the actual product. With painting it's the canvas and paint, people think "oh that's just a few euros of supplies" and suddenly the price feels inflated to them. They never calculate the hours.
And you're right about the story part too. They get to frame it as supporting sustainable local art and that's worth way more to them than the 60,000 crowns was worth to you. You basically subsidized their PR.
I don't know how you fix it though. I sell at local fairs where people are pricing my work against a print from IKEA, so I'm probably the wrong person to ask. I just know it stings when you do the math and realize you'd have made more staying home and doing almost anything else.
The painting comparison is right and it's worse than you think, because at least the painter buys the canvas. My materials literally cost me nothing and I handed them the invoice that proved it. Like walking into a negotiation with my own knife already in my back.
And yeah, the sustainability framing is the part that stings. They got the green story for their annual report, I got the equivalent of a plumber's hourly rate. Good deal for everybody except the one standing in the rust dust for a month.
On the fixing it part I don't have an answer either, and I've been doing this thirty years. I tried once billing the hauling as separate line items, truck rental, diesel, my time loading. They paid it but you could feel the whole room get cold. The museum doesn't want to see the scaffolding, they want the finished magic trick. Still send those invoices though. Better cold and paid than warm and broke.
You've got it exactly. They think the raw material is the story, so when it costs nothing they assume the price tag should shrink to match. Nobody walks into a gallery and asks the painter what the canvas cost.
And you're right about the gesture part. That's what stings. They get to file it under sustainable practice and community engagement and I get 180 crowns an hour for welding steel in a yard in February. The sustainability was my back, mostly.
Did you take the found plates job anyway, or did you push back on the fee?