Search

For two years I painted under the ceiling light in the back room, which is one of those frosted dome fixtures that makes everything look like a faded photo. I kept thinking my greens were muddy. Turns out they were fine, I just couldn't see them. So my husband clamped an old architect lamp to the shelf above the easel, the kind with the long spring arms, and I put a 5000K bulb in it. Night and day. Except now I can see every wobbly edge on the tree line I've been working on since Labor Day and honestly I'm a little insulted. The lamp is doing its job. I'm the problem. Also the kids think the arm looks like a praying mantis and keep bending it around when they come in to say goodnight, so I'm re-aiming it every single night. Small price I guess. Anyone else change one thing in the setup and suddenly get a much harsher look at their own work? I don't know whether to be grateful or go back to the dome light and my comfortable delusions.

A small thing I keep turning over. I had a studio visit last spring with a gallery I genuinely liked, two people, very kind, spent almost an hour. At the end one of them said they'd like to "see more work." No timeline, no follow-up date, nothing. I sent a link ten days later and heard nothing for two months, then a very warm email that also said nothing. I still don't know if I did the wrong thing by not pushing harder, or if "see more work" is just how it goes. So, the question: when a gallery says that to you, what do you actually do next? Do you send more, do you wait, do you ask them straight out what they mean? Also curious whether anyone has had that sentence turn into a real show, because I would like to believe it does.

The studio has one wall where I can stand back far enough to really look at a thing, and I've had this small interior on it for three days, tilted maybe four degrees off level. Just enough that you'd feel it before you'd name it. Every time I walked past I noticed, then forgot, then noticed again. I wanted to see how long it took for the tilt to become the subject instead of the painting. It took about a day. Then I straightened it and the whole piece read differently, better, the way a room settles when someone opens a window. I don't know what that says about me or about the painting, but there's something in it about how we see. The eye forgives a lot and then very suddenly doesn't. Probably no point to this. I just thought other people here might do the same stupid experiment and tell me what happened.

Rebuilding the armature on a piece I started in March. The weld on the inside of the shoulder joint was ugly. Not structural, just ugly. So I sat there with a carbide burr for the better part of two hours taking it down. My apprentice, back when I had one, used to say I do this to punish myself. Maybe. But I've seen what happens to work twenty years on. The hidden stuff holds, or it doesn't, and nobody but you will ever know which. Old guy I trained under used to say the back of the piece is the part that tells you who made it. He was right and I hated hearing it at the time. Anyway. Ground it flat. It's inside the joint. Nobody's going to see it.

Something I keep turning over: my first gallery never saw my best work. They saw a small edition I'd made almost as a joke, printed badly on purpose, and that's what they wanted. For years I read it as a fluke, or as them not understanding the rest. Now I think they saw the one piece where I wasn't trying to be clever. So I want to know what piece of yours actually opened the door. Not the body of work you're proudest of, the one that did the work. Was it the thing you'd have picked? Or did someone else see something in the piece you almost threw out? I'll go first properly: mine was a two-colour screenprint, 40 copies, one of which is still stuck to my studio wall with tape because I never got around to framing it. Tell me yours. Especially if it wasn't the one you'd have chosen.

Eight hours with epoxy and stone dust filling hairline cracks in the back of a plinth that sits against a wall. Nobody's ever going to look at it. Client won't know. But I know, and I couldn't leave it rough. That's the thing I can't translate to anyone who only sees the work online. The camera catches the front. The part that took three days is invisible. I post a finished piece and people say "clean work" and I want to tell them yeah, it's clean because I spent Tuesday afternoon with my face six inches from the back edge of a thing no one will touch. Fabrication teaches you this. You don't get to skip the hidden side just because no one checks. The work is the work whether it's photographed or not. I don't know how to say that in a caption. So I'll say it here instead.

Got burned once early on. Gallery had good photos online, good reputation on paper. Signed, shipped work, then visited in person for the opening and half the space was a storage room they rented out. My pieces were hung in a hallway. Never made that mistake again. Now I won't sign anything without seeing the actual walls. Lost two promising deals over it and I don't care. If they won't let you look at where your work is going to live, that tells you something. Am I being too rigid here or do you all do the same?

Spent a month on a welded steel piece. Ground every weld down until the seams disappeared. Sanded and sealed it. Put it in the yard to check the shadow line and my neighbor's dog knocked it over, bent one of the legs out of square. Straightened it the next morning. You'd never know it happened. But I caught myself thinking about it differently now. That little accident is part of the thing now, whether anyone can see it or not. Point is, I spent 30 hours on a seam nobody's going to inspect and a dog changed the piece in two seconds. I keep thinking about that ratio and I don't know what to do with it. It's not a complaint. It's just the truth of making things, and the online version of it is a circus. Probably won't even post the piece. The photo won't show what the work was. It never does.

Had a meeting a few years ago with a space in Berlin that said they loved my work but wanted to "see more range" before they'd commit to a show. Which translated to: could I make something less repetitive, less conceptual, more decorative. Basically could I be someone else. I said no and we both wasted six months anyway. I still wonder if I should have been more flexible. But also, the whole reason I work in print is repetition. The multiple IS the point. So "show range" felt like showing I didn't believe in my own ideas. What's the worst thing a gallery has asked you to change about your work? And did you do it?

I've been on the same portrait for almost three weeks now. Not the whole portrait, the jaw. Left side, the shadow under it, where it turns toward the neck. There is a specific thing I want there, a softness, and I keep getting it and then losing it in the next stroke. Soft pastel is unforgiving in this one way that keeps humbling me. You can't glaze over a mistake and pretend. You lift it with tape, you go back in, and the paper is a little more tired each time. I'm on Fabriano Tiziano, the grey, and at this point that whole corner has been worked so hard it's gone shiny. New pastel slides off it. So now the fix is to stop, and I don't want to stop, because stopping means admitting I have to start this one again. I know the problem is that I'm painting the jaw from thinking instead of from looking. But that's the easy sentence to write. The hard part is that I can no longer see which of the five versions was the true one, I've stared so long. I put it against the mirror and it looks fine. I photograph it and it looks dead. Which do you trust? For what it's worth the ear on that side finally works. Small mercy.

There was a small Bellini in a museum near Annecy, part of a loan show, and I drove 140 km each way to stand in front of it. Eleven minutes. Then I left. It was enough and it was not enough at the same time. What got me was not the face or the composition. It was the shoulder of the Madonna, the transition where the neck goes into it. There is no edge. You look for the line and there isn't one, it is just flesh becoming cloth becoming shadow, and you cannot find where he did it. I have been painting twenty years and I still cannot do that. I can fake it. Faking it is different. You can see the seam when someone fakes it, even if a photograph hides it. Drove home with the radio off. Bof. I don't know what I am supposed to do with that feeling. It doesn't make me want to work harder exactly. It makes me want to work slower and accept that I may never get there. The museum cafe was closed, so I ate a sandwich in the car in the rain like an idiot. Worth it.

Working on a seated figure in mild steel, about five feet, and the arm-to-torso connection is the whole problem. I've had this thing tacked for a week and every time I walk past it the joint reads wrong. Not weak. Wrong. The plane breaks where the deltoid should carry through and the light catches an edge that shouldn't be there. So I spent Monday through Wednesday building it up with 70S-6 and grinding it back down. Three passes. Ground it, looked at it, built it back. Yesterday I got it where it needs to be, and then I stood there annoyed, because from any angle a normal person will ever look at this piece, you can't see the joint at all. It's buried under the shoulder mass. Nobody's going to walk into the yard, stick their head around the side and go, hey, nice radius on that transition. Fabricator I apprenticed under would have told me to stop at the first pass and put the time into the hands, which are the actual problem. Anyway. It's right now. That's the whole point and I know it, I just wanted to say it out loud somewhere nobody's going to tell me it looks fine.

My sixteen-year-old came into the studio yesterday without knocking, which she never does, and stood behind me for maybe a full minute while I was working. Then she said, "Maman, your paintings look less sad now." I wanted to be defensive at first. But she's right. I didn't even see it until she said it. For years my palette was all terre verte and raw umber and bone black, everything in that low grey northern light. I think I was painting the inside of my own head without realising it. The fallow years I had, the disappointment, it was all there in the colour, every time. Now there's more warmth. Not bright, not cheerful, just... alive. A little Naples yellow in the shadows. A red glaze where I would have left it dead. Kids see things. She doesn't know about the decade I lost, she only knows what she sees on the easel. And she saw it.

I had a new student in my botanical watercolor class yesterday. She's a pleasant enough woman, retired, looking for a hobby. We were going through the basics of setting up a composition from a live specimen, a simple cyclamen leaf, and she asked, quite earnestly, if she could just take a photograph of it and trace the outline instead. I explained that tracing would defeat the purpose of learning to see, which is rather the whole point of the exercise. She seemed unconvinced. She said it would save time and look neater. I suggested she give it a proper try first, and if she still wanted to trace at the end of class, I would help her. She did not want to trace by the end of class. But the amount of energy I had to spend not saying "you are paying me to teach you to draw, not to show you how to avoid learning to draw" was considerable. I understand that people want shortcuts. I do. Watercolor is difficult and it takes years to develop any real control. But the shortcuts don't actually get you where you want to go. They just leave you dependent on the shortcut. I suppose I am old-fashioned about this. Learning to see, really see, is the skill. Everything else is technique layered on top of that foundation.

Sold a little vase at the market on Saturday that I thought was one of my worst pieces. The glaze came out cloudy and the lip slumped to one side when I was being lazy with the wire. I almost didn't even put it out. Some woman picked it up, turned it around for like five minutes, and said it was her favorite thing on the table. Paid full price without asking for a discount, which never happens here. And look. I took the money. I smiled and wrapped it up. But I've been thinking about it all week. Either my taste is completely broken or people genuinely see something in the wonk that I write off as failure. Maybe both. Because the pieces I actually love, the ones I photograph and post and get excited about, those sit. It's the accidents that sell. My grandma always said the kiln knows better than the maker. Maybe she's right and I'm just too close to see it. Anyway, tonight I pulled the one I was convince was ruined and I'm leaving it out on the shelf. Not hiding it in the back. We'll see who's wrong.

Ok so I need to say this somewhere. I spent almost two hours yesterday filming a reel of a wash going down, and you know what the wash looked like by the time I checked the footage? terrible, because I'd been half-watching my phone propped on a stack of books instead of actually painting it. the paper dried uneven where I lifted the tape early to grab a better angle, and I have a whole sheet now with a big ugly bloom right in the middle of the sky. real painting, ruined, for 11 seconds of video. and the wild part is it got like 200 views. my last actual painting got 2.3k and sold in four days. so what am I even doing. I think what's getting me is that I started this because of the light on my kitchen wall at like 4pm and now I'm learning about hooks and trending audio and I feel so dumb for caring about both at once. like I want people to see the work and also the entire system is built so the only way they see the work is if I become a content person, which is genuinely the opposite of the thing that makes me good at painting. I zone out for three hours and that's the whole point. you can't zone out with a tripod. my partner keeps telling me to just post the painting and let it be boring and I know they're right but there's this voice that's like ok but what if nobody sees it. and then I remember I have 700 followers which is not a business, it's a group chat. so the stakes are kind of imaginary. anyway I'm going to paint today and not film any of it and if the sky blooms I'll keep it. maybe I'll post the wrecked one, honestly it's more interesting than the reel.

I sat with that all evening after I got home. That quilt took me three weeks, hand-pieced, hand-quilted, every scrap of fabric out of my grandmother's scrap bag and some from my own mama's housedresses I'd been saving. $350 is already low if you figure materials and time. But she patted my hand like I was a sweet old lady doing a little hobby. I didn't say anything to her. I smiled and thanked her and wrapped it up nice. But I been thinking, folks see the quilts and they see me and they think "bless her heart" instead of seeing the work. I been doing this since I was seven years old. That's 56 years. You don't get to call that cute. I raised my prices $50 after that. Felt wrong in my chest but I did it anyway. Anybody else have to fight the urge to apologize for what you're worth?

I spent years putting only the final work online. Perfect lighting, good photo, the painting resolved. Crickets, mostly. A few likes from other painters. A few months ago I was frustrated with a figure painting, the hand was wrong for the fourth time, the whole thing looked a mess, and I took a photo of it on the easel with my palette旁边, just to vent to a painter friend. I put it on Instagram almost without thinking. That post got more comments than anything I'd put up in six months. People like to see the struggle. They like to see that you also don't know what you're doing for a while. I think for a long time I thought showing process would somehow diminish the finished work, like revealing the trick. But most people aren't painters. They have no idea what goes into it, and watching something get ugly and then get pulled back out of the ugly, that's the part they actually want to see. I'm still not comfortable with it. I was trained to show only the resolved thing. But I can't argue with the numbers, and more to the point I can't argue with the fact that the conversations are better. People ask real questions instead of just saying "beautiful." Wondering if anyone else has found that the unfinished, uncertain thing gets more traction than the polished final version.

Today I want to tell one thing which made me very happy, so kindly bear with me. There is a girl in my class, Sunita, maybe fourteen years. When she first came she would sit at the very back and would not lift the brush. Her lines were shaking, and she used to hide the paper under her leg so nobody would see. Some of the other girls laughed also. I did not scold anybody, only I told her, bamboo nib is not to be afraid of, it is only a small stick, if your hand trembles the line will tremble, so first make your mind quiet, then the line. For many months she only did the border work. Straight lines, small dots, the easy things. Honestly I thought maybe she will leave the class like so many do when the school exams come. Today she came early, before everyone, and put down a full sheet. Kohbar, the marriage chamber painting, complete. The lotus in the centre, the fish pair, the bamboo grove, the sun and moon in the corners. Her line is still not steady everywhere, I can see where the hand stopped and started again. But she has done the whole thing herself, and the proportion is correct. That much I can say with straight face. I have been doing this work since I was small, learning from my mother, and still I will say this. When a child who was frightened of the brush completes a kohbar, that is a bigger thing than any sale I have made. Money comes and goes in this work, that is one separate sorrow. But the form going forward, into hands younger than mine, that is the real question for all of us. I have kept her painting carefully in the cupboard, wrapped in cloth, because the paper is still new and the colours are setting. Her mother does not know yet. She wants to show when the whole family sits together on Sunday. I told her, do one thing, do not touch it again with the brush now, let it be as it is. First work should stay first work, with all its small mistakes, so that after ten years you can look back and see how far your hand has come. Now she is asking me for a bigger sheet. So I am thinking, for the girls who finish their first kohbar, maybe we should do something small, a proper ceremony, sindoor and sweets, like we do when a student is given her first needle. If anybody here has done such a thing in their own teaching, I would like to hear how you did it.

Young guy at the open studio last weekend. Watched me work a piece of limestone for maybe thirty seconds. Then he tells me he could program a CNC router to cut the same shape in twenty minutes and walk away while it ran. I asked him when was the last time he chipped a tooth on a tool grit he didn't see. When he had to look at a piece of stone for three hours before he knew what was in it. When he ruined a week of work because he hit a fissure nobody could see. He said he didn't need to do any of that because the machine did it for him. I'm not against the machines. I've used them for roughing out when it makes sense. But the way he said it, like the whole point was to not be there. Like the work was an inconvenience between him and having something to sell. Twenty minutes. I wanted to hand him the chisel and a block of granite and see how that twenty minutes felt on hour three.