Search

Not the painting's fault. Mine. I finished the big one, 190 by 160, three weeks of layering cold wax and burnt umber on top of a grey ground that had finally, finally settled into the right weight. Left it on the studio table to cure. Came in this morning and there is a fine white bloom across the whole top half. Not the wax itself. The varnish I mixed myself, too much turpentine, and it has gone milky in the cold. I know the rule. I know it. Test on a scrap, wait a day, and I have told students this same thing and watched them ignore me. So now the palette knife and the rags come out and I scrape down to the ground and start the layers again. Three weeks gone by lunchtime. The strange part is I am not angry. There is something almost restful in it. The second version is usually better anyway, that is the joke I tell myself. But my hands still smell of solvent and I have a gallery call on Thursday and nothing on the wall. Cold studio, milky varnish. If you have done this, you know. If you have not, do not start.

There was a still life I nearly scrapped. Peaches and a silver pot, nothing special, but the light on the base of the pot was doing something I couldn't get right for weeks. I had it on the easel so long I started to hate it. I was one pass of the palette knife away from wiping the whole thing down. Then one afternoon I just stopped fighting it and put a last thin glaze on, and suddenly the light was there. Not perfect, but there. I signed it, varnished it, put it in a corner. A collector from the Netherlands bought it yesterday. Asked me if I could do more in that same palette. And I keep thinking about how close it came to never existing, how many paintings die in that window between almost and done. That's the real lesson, I think. The finish is where the painting decides if it gets to be a painting.

When I'm down, I open the drawer where I keep old tubes that are nearly finished. Not the good ones, the ones I'll never be without, the dregs. Each one smells different, and it brings back the studio I was standing in when I used it up. The Naples yellow from my teacher's atelier, that one smells of turpentine and dust and his pipe. The raw sienna I squeezed the last of while my daughter was teething, I can still place the year. No one warns you that oil paint keeps memory better than you do. You think you're the one doing the remembering, and then you uncap a tube and you're twenty-nine years old again.

I did a half-length of a woman in a green armchair last spring. Fourteen sessions, two hours each, plus the drying and the varnishing. Quoted 2 200 euros for the painting. The client wanted it framed and I said yes, I'll take care of it. Went to my man in the 7e, solid oak, hand-finished, 310 euros. Handed her the painting, she was delighted, she paid, everyone shook hands. Then I did the arithmetic on a Sunday, which is always a mistake. Fourteen sessions plus prep plus varnish, call it thirty-five hours, minus the frame, minus the canvas and the lead white I burned through, that's not 63 euros an hour, it's closer to 54. Before I pay myself anything at all. For work that took me eleven years of atelier training to be able to do. I know that 54 is not nothing. But my dentist doesn't frame things for free. Voilà. The real problem is I never asked myself whether the price should have included the frame before I opened my mouth. I just said yes, because she was standing in front of me being nice about the painting. I am very good at being nice about the painting. I've since put framing on a separate line on the quote. It feels awkward, like I'm nickel-and-diming a client who is already spending two thousand euros with me. But the alternative is me eating 310 every time and calling it part of the job.

For eleven years I charged 3,200 euros for a portrait, half-length, one figure, hands extra if they wanted hands. Eleven years, same number. It stopped being a price and became a fact of nature, like the weather in Lyon in February. Last autumn I did the calculation properly for the first time. Drying time with a slow-drying medium, the sittings, three of which the client cancels, the photographs, the drawings on paper before a brush touches the panel, the palette, the varnish, the six weeks of thinking about it while doing something else. At 3,200 I was making less per hour than the man who repairs my frames, and he does not have to be charming for two hours at a time. So I quoted 4,000 to a woman in Villeurbanne. Good project, an interior with her mother's armchair in it that I actually wanted to paint. She wrote back that it was above what she had in mind and thanked me politely. I felt sick for two days. Then I felt fine, and then better than fine. Because I realised the old number was not a price, it was a fear with a number attached to it, and I had been paying that fear in hours of my life. The next one, a man in the sixth arrondissement, did not blink at 4,000. I spent the extra 800 on a better panel and a lot of cadmium I did not strictly need. I am not telling anyone to double their prices. I am telling you that the number you are scared to say out loud is probably the correct one and the fear is just the fear.

so i finally finished this 30x40, big flat color thing, took me about 11 days of actual work. quoted 1100. felt fine about it until i started adding up materials tonight. canvas was 68, the good one. paint, and i use a lot of it because flat color means no cheating with glazes, easily 70 bucks of paint. brushes i destroy, say 20. varnish, whatever. so like 160 in materials, which means 940 for 11 days. that's 85 a day. i could go work at a coffee shop for 85 a day and not have hand cramps. and the worst part is 1100 already felt like a lot to ask, like i had to justify it. i said it out loud to someone and immediately went "well, for me it's a good price" like i was apologizing for existing. ngl the gallery thing is what gets me. if it sells through them that 1100 becomes 550, minus my 160, and now i'm at 35 a day. cool. cool cool cool. i'm not raising it this time because it's basically sold, but the next one of this size is 1600 and i'm already dreading saying that number out loud.

I've been charging $75 for a 9x12 acrylic landscape for about two years now. Small canvas, usually a marsh or a treeline, the kind of thing that sells to somebody's aunt at a fair. Feels like a fair price, people don't blink. Then I did the actual math in the car on the way home Sunday. Canvas and paint maybe $12, frame $18 from the craft store when I catch a sale, and I don't count the varnish or the brushes. So $45 left. That piece was four evenings, probably six hours with drying time and reworking the sky twice. Seven and a half an hour, before I count the drive or the $40 booth fee. I know I'm not going to get $30 an hour at a church craft fair. I'm not trying to. But I sat in my driveway for a minute and thought about how I could just skip the frame and sell it on a panel and keep the $18. The thing is I like the frames. They make it look finished. Anyway, next fair is in October. I'm thinking $95 with the frame and seeing what happens. That's the whole post, I don't have a clean ending for it.

there is a certain point in the afternoon when the light through my one window dies and everything on the table turns the same muddy grey. it happens around 3:40 right now. i don't turn the overhead light on. i just keep working in the murk, and honestly some of my best marks get made in that half hour, when i can't actually tell what color i'm dipping into. today i cut up an old gas bill from my brother's apartment. it was in a box of his paperwork that i've been dragging between apartments for six years, opening and closing, never doing anything with. the paper had gone that soft yellow. i tore it into strips and laid it down wet, and the ink bled, and now there's this faint "AMOUNT DUE: 84.11" ghosted under a wash of burnt umber. i don't know if that's good or ghoulish. i have never fully decided. the thing i actually wanted to say: i have a rule that i don't clean the studio on days i make something. so there is a stack of cups by the sink, dried gouache on the floor, and a jacket of his hanging on the back of the door that now permanently smells like fixative and varnish. i wore it last week because it was cold and i haven't washed it since and i don't think i'm going to. half of the work is just refusing to put things away.

The brush for the fine line, the one for the outlines, that brush is now having only three hairs. My mother used that same brush. Before her also it was there in the house. The bamboo handle is black and shining from oil of the hand only, no varnish ever. My son said buy a new one from Patna, it is nothing, hundred rupees. I said you bring it and I will see. He brought. The new brush hairs are too many, too stiff. It drinks more paint and puts it down thick, and in Mithila line the whole thing is that the line should be thin like a thread of the sari border and should go and come back without shaking. So now I am doing the peacock tail with three hairs and it is taking double time. Last week I finished only two sheets. The fish border I did in one and half day which normally is half day work. There is a girl who is coming to learn, Sudha, fourteen years. She asked why not just use the new one, it is better brush. I told her the new brush is better for the person who is learning, so the hand becomes steady. For me the three hairs are giving the line I know. But I am also thinking now whether I am keeping the old thing because it is good or only because it is old. That question is sitting with me since two days. Anyway. Work is going slow and the eyes are getting tired by evening. If anybody here is having a brush they have kept beyond its life, I would like to hear honestly how long you kept it.

Fifteen by twenty-two centimeters. A corner of a room, morning light on a folded tablecloth, a copper pot, half a chair. Two days under the paint, maybe three with the varnish drying. I quoted 1 900 euros in September and I've been sitting on the price list since, not sending the new one. The number I want is 2 700. Same painting, same size, forty percent more. Nothing changed except that I finally did the arithmetic properly: materials, the linen, the ground, the week I lose afterward not painting because my head is still in that room. And a gallery in the sixth wants four of these for spring. Four at 1 900 is 7 600 for a season of work, before they take their cut. I know what the answer is. I know a woman in Villeurbanne who charges 3 200 for this size and sleeps fine. But I've written the email four times and deleted it four times, and there is a version of me that would rather paint it at 1 900 and complain than send it. My wife says the price is not the problem, the asking is. She is usually right and it is very annoying. I'll send it Monday. Writing it here so I have to.

Scraped back the big one today. 180 by 160, the one I've had on the wall since early spring. Twenty minutes with the palette knife and two winters of accumulated surface are on the floor in grey curls. The reason was not noble. It had gone dead under the varnish. Nothing wrong with it exactly, all the moves were there in the right places, and that was the problem. I could read it like a shopping list. What I keep thinking about is that the first months of a painting are the only honest part. After that you're mostly managing your own decisions. Somewhere in there it stops being a finding and becomes a project, and I have never once been able to tell exactly when that happens. Only that it has. Naja. It's under there still, some of it. The wax doesn't go away, it just sits lower. Curious whether anyone else works this way, or whether the rest of you are more sensible and stop while the thing is still alive.

Had a gallery owner on the phone today, wants me in their spring group show. Flattering, fine. Then he asks, casual, like it's nothing, if I could "streamline" my process a bit, maybe work on a couple of panels at once so I'd have more pieces ready. Streamline. As if the drying time of linseed oil is a scheduling problem I should negotiate with. I paint maybe four or five serious pieces a year. That's not a shortage of effort, that's the pace the medium demands. You can't rush an oil painting the way you can't rush a pregnancy, and nobody asks a pregnant woman to streamline her gestation for the spring calendar. I told him I'd have two, maybe three. He went quiet. Then he said that might be "tight." Bof. I'd rather show two honest paintings than five rushed ones. I've seen what rushed looks like on a gallery wall, and it smells like varnish over regret.

A gallery in Munich took a big 180 by 140 oil and cold wax piece in June. Sold it last week for €9,800, which is a good number for me, I'm not complaining. But I got curious last night and added up the actual studio hours. Not the staring at the wall hours, the hands-on hours, plus prep and varnishing and the two days I spent just getting the surface right. It came out to about €41 an hour. And that's not counting the years behind it, the materials, the studio rent, the gallery's cut which was already off the top. €41 an hour is what a plumber charges in this country and he doesn't have to paint over the work and start again. I don't know what the point is exactly. I think it's that nobody prices the thinking hours. You can't invoice for the Tuesday you just sat with it and didn't touch it, but that Tuesday is in the painting. The gallery would laugh at me if I tried to build that into the price. So we all quietly eat it and pretend the canvas took two weeks. Not going to raise the prices. The market here holds what it holds. Just wanted the number on the table once.

A collector came to the studio last month, saw an interior I'd finished weeks earlier, wanted it. I named my price, nine hundred euros, which for me is honest but not bold. They said yes immediately. And instead of relief I felt guilty, like I'd overcharged, like I should have said eight hundred if I was being fair. Sit with that for a second. I'm doing a thing I've trained twenty-five years to do, at a price that nets out to about forty euros an hour before materials and studio costs, and the guilt lives in me because they didn't flinch. I keep a ledger of every finished painting, hours, materials, price. It's brutal reading. Nine hundred sounds like real money to people who don't know the hours don't end when I stop painting. The stretching, the varnishing, the framing, the emails, the schlepping. Everyone who pays for the painting pays for approximately one painting's worth of unpaid work around it. I know what the actual answer is. Raise prices until the flinch comes from the other direction. I've added maybe ten percent in three years. I'm scared of the ceiling because I don't know where it is, and the collector who says yes too fast terrifies me more than the one who negotiates. Anyway the painting is gone now and the guilt faded. But I keep thinking about what it would feel like to name a price and not apologise internally for it.

My first real gallery show, maybe ten years ago. I walk in and they've hung my still life under a spotlight so hot and close the varnish is practically sweating. The frame's casting a shadow across half the painting. I stood there thinking, this is where my work lives now, and I have no say in it. What's the worst thing a gallery ever did to your work in their space? Framing disasters, lighting crimes, hanging your 40x60 in the bathroom hallway, I want to hear it.

I've done this three times now and I keep doing it. A client says they want the best, gold leaf, a hand-carved frame, the real thing, and I nod along because yes, that is what I want to make too. Then I order the frame from a specialist in Avignon who does nothing else, and I'm already €700 in before I've touched a brush to linen. The portrait itself took about six weeks, off and on, between teaching and the daughter's schedule. When I calculated my hourly rate after the frame, the stretcher, the materials, the varnish, it came to about €11.50 an hour. My daughter makes more babysitting. I know I should charge separately for the frame. I know I should quote the whole thing upfront with a deposit that covers materials. But there's something in me that wants the final price to just be the price, like the frame is part of the painting, not a line item. Stupid, probably. The client would never know the difference. Anyone else just bad at separating what you make from what you need to make it?

I pulled an old still life out of the rack this week. Pears on a copper pot, I painted it around 2015, and it always bothered me that the far edge of the pot went dead. Hard line, no atmosphere. So I set up to retouch it, scraped just that passage down, and repainted it. Now the problem is the mark itself. The new paint is confident, it turns, it sits in the light the way it should. But next to the older paint it looks young. You can feel the ten years in the difference. My hand is not the same hand. The retouch is technically better and it does not belong to the painting. I know there are ways to age a surface, varnish layers, glazes. But that's cosmesis. The real question is whether you can put a new mark into an old painting and have it be honest, or whether it always stays a transplant. I left it half done. Not sure I want to finish.

Nothing dramatic. I finished the interior with the chair by the window, the one I've been circling since March, and when I stepped back it was simply done. No more to do. And then I signed it. Bottom right, thin, with the date. I realised halfway through the C that I hadn't put my name on a finished painting since 2014. The fallow years, I taught. Demonstrations, student work, corrections on other people's canvases. My own name went into the corner of nothing. I told myself it was modesty or discipline, but it was fear, honestly. A signature is a claim. You say: this is finished, this is mine, this is what I have to offer. The paint is still wet so it will sit in the studio for a week before I varnish. All afternoon I kept walking past it to look at the little dark mark in the corner, ridiculous. Bof. But voilà. Anyway. There it is.

A woman came Thursday to look at a little panel I'd half-forgotten, a corner of my own kitchen with the copper pot and the morning light coming sideways. Nothing grand, maybe 30 by 24. She stood in front of it a long time and then asked me, quite apologetically, if she could sit down. She cried, and not in a performing way. I've sold paintings before. It has never once felt like this. Usually it's a transaction, a receipt, a man in a good coat telling me it will go above the sofa. This time I felt like I was handing over a piece of my house. Now I have to varnish it and let it dry and I'm almost afraid to touch it. Stupid, at my age. But I keep going back into the studio to look at it, knowing it's not mine anymore. The strange part is the money is not what stayed with me. What stayed is that somebody saw the exact thing I was looking at at seven in the morning in my kitchen, alone, and recognized it.

Our library does a little community show every spring, nothing juried, you just sign up for a 4 foot panel and hang whatever. I'd been planning to put in the marsh piece I did in October, the one that actually came out the way I wanted. I hung two others instead. Both were ones I nearly painted over. A small still life of the kids' cereal bowls from last summer that I hated for months because the light is flat and the left bowl is honestly a little lopsided, and a scrappy plein air thing from the parking lot behind the rink in February where I got the cold sky right and the tree wrong. I don't fully know why. I think I'm tired of only showing the ones that behave. The cereal bowls especially, my 11 year old walked past the table while I was varnishing it and said oh that's the actual morning. Anyway it's up until the 22nd. I keep catching myself wondering if anyone will say anything about them, which is a stupid way to feel about two paintings I almost threw out. The marsh one can go to the fall fair.