When a gallery says no, do they ever tell you why? Mine never have

Stone and steel here, so this might be an easier game for painters, but I'll ask anyway.

I've had work turned down by galleries maybe a dozen times over the years. Not one of them ever told me why. Usually it's nothing at all, and twice it was the same line about their program not being a fit. First time I figured I was owed an explanation. Now I think a no is a no and you take it and move on.

But I want to know if I'm wrong about this. Has a gallery ever given you a real reason? Something specific you could actually use, or at least argue with? Or does it always come back as program or space or timing.

Mine, for whatever it's worth. The one time I got anything close, a dealer told me my piece was too heavy for her floor. Which was true, so I didn't hold it against her.

6comments

Add your reply to this discussion…

6 comments

Karen Wessel·2w

I paint acrylics, so different medium, but I've had pretty much the same experience. Two real reasons in about six years of sporadically applying: one gallery told me my pieces were too small for the wall they had open, which was actually useful, and another said they already had two landscape painters on the roster. That one stung but at least it was honest. Everything else was the polite nothing or "not a fit."

I don't think you're wrong to take a no and move on, but I do think the "not a fit" line usually isn't about your work being bad. A lot of the time it's wall space, or what sold for them last season, or the director just doesn't respond to it. Nothing you can argue with. I've stopped trying to read meaning into the silence. Doesn't make it less annoying though.

Teddy Lin·2w

the "we already have two landscape painters" thing is brutal but honestly it's the only kind of no i trust. at least it's a real constraint and not a mood. the too-small one too, that's the gallery accidentally telling you their wall dimensions, which is basically free intel.

the ones that get me are the "not a fit" replies where you can tell the person typing it didn't look past the third thumbnail. like ok, not a fit for what, the program or your inbox lol

Roman PetrakOP·2w

Stone doesn't get the third-thumbnail treatment the same way, a jpeg of a 900 pound piece reads as a gray blob, so I've probably been skipped for worse reasons than yours. But yeah. "Not a fit" and "didn't open the file" look identical from out here.

The tell is when they can't name one piece. If they'd looked, they'd say something, even something wrong. Silence means nobody looked.

I've stopped chasing the reason. I ask once, politely, and if nothing comes back I cross them off. Twelve nos and maybe three of them were about the work.

Roman PetrakOP·2w

The too small for the wall one is the only kind worth getting. That's a fact you can act on. You can go build two bigger pieces or find a gallery with smaller walls.

The landscape one, I'd call that a real reason too. Two landscapes on the roster means they're not buying, that's inventory, not taste. Most of what you get back is neither. It's a director who doesn't want to say the work isn't for them, so it comes out as program.

I've stopped treating a no as information unless it comes with a number attached. Size, price, wall, roster. Anything else is noise.

Lukas Brandt·2w

Mostly no. I've had the polite nothing, and the "not a fit with our program" line, which is real but useless because it usually means the director's taste or the wall height or what sold last season, not anything about the work. The times I did get something usable it came because there was already a relationship, a person who'd stood in front of the actual canvas and was willing to say it. That's rarer than it should be.

Where I'd push back a little: I don't think you're owed it, but I don't think "a no is a no" is the full story either. A no from one gallery tells you about that gallery. A dozen noes that all land the same way is data, even without a sentence attached to it. You just have to read it yourself, which is the annoying part.

And I wouldn't assume painters have it easier. Stone and steel at least photograph as themselves. Oil on a screen is a lie half the time.

Roman PetrakOP·2w

You're right that the wall height is a number. I've had that one and it stung less than the silence, because at least I could measure my own work against it. Built two larger pieces off that feedback and one of them sold.

The relationship part I'll grant you. Every usable no I've gotten came from somebody who'd actually seen the work in person. Strangers write the form letter, people who know you write the real thing. That's the whole reason it's rare.