Search

i did the thing. handed my notice in at the warehouse on friday. five years of forklift shifts and painting at midnight, and from monday im just. a painter. that's the whole job now. ive got about eight months of savings, a stack of commissions, and no idea whatsoever if this is the bravest or the most stupid thing ive ever done. probably both. feels completely insane to type out

I spent years putting only the final work online. Perfect lighting, good photo, the painting resolved. Crickets, mostly. A few likes from other painters. A few months ago I was frustrated with a figure painting, the hand was wrong for the fourth time, the whole thing looked a mess, and I took a photo of it on the easel with my palette旁边, just to vent to a painter friend. I put it on Instagram almost without thinking. That post got more comments than anything I'd put up in six months. People like to see the struggle. They like to see that you also don't know what you're doing for a while. I think for a long time I thought showing process would somehow diminish the finished work, like revealing the trick. But most people aren't painters. They have no idea what goes into it, and watching something get ugly and then get pulled back out of the ugly, that's the part they actually want to see. I'm still not comfortable with it. I was trained to show only the resolved thing. But I can't argue with the numbers, and more to the point I can't argue with the fact that the conversations are better. People ask real questions instead of just saying "beautiful." Wondering if anyone else has found that the unfinished, uncertain thing gets more traction than the polished final version.

Something I noticed while sorting old sketchbooks this week: the pages from my architecture days, drawn in a hurry between site visits, are looser and better than anything I've done since I started taking painting seriously. Same hand, same pen. The only difference is that back then nobody was going to look at it. Now I sit down to a fresh page and the line gets careful, and careful is death for ink. I did a corner house in Basavanagudi on Sunday, one of those with the madras-tile roof and the green shutters, and I caught myself going back over a balcony railing to fix it up. Ruined the whole rhythm of it. The railing is now the only neat thing on a page of scribble. I've started doing a throwaway warm-up page before the "real" one, just to get the cautiousness out of my system. Half the time the warm-up is the one worth keeping. Curious whether this happened to anyone else when they went from hobby to calling it their work. Does the seriousness creep into your hand?

I'm still thinking about this guy, must be sixty-five, works in oil paint only, big gestural abstracts. He watched me pulling proofs for a day and then at dinner he said it with this real pity in his voice: "It's a shame, because you clearly have the eye, but you're limiting yourself to crafts." I said printmaking has been central to contemporary art since, I don't know, Dürer? And he said Dürer was a painter who also did prints. Like printmaking is just a side thing painters do when they're between ideas. The thing that gets me is the hierarchy. Oil painting = serious. Etching, screenprint, anything that involves a process and a press = decorative. It's so nineteenth century. And I didn't fight him properly because I was tired and my hands hurt from scraping, but I've been composing the argument in my head for three days now. You know when the perfect retort arrives too late?

After years of being afraid of it, I raised my hourly rate from €45 to €65 at the beginning of this year. Not a dramatic jump. Reasonable for someone with my training and experience. I lost three regular clients in the first month. One of them told me I was "becoming expensive for a local painter." The other two just went quiet. And you know what? The commissions I've taken since then have been better. More interesting subjects, less revision demand, people who actually understand what they're asking for when they say "can you make the light softer." The clients who left were the ones who saw me as a service provider, not a painter. They wanted cheap, they got what they wanted somewhere else. I still feel a little guilty about the one who was a friend of a friend. But I did the math and I was earning less per hour than my daughter makes babysitting. That's not sustainable. That's not even dignified. If you raise your prices and nobody leaves, you probably didn't raise them enough. That's what my old teacher told me and I thought it was cynical. Now I think it's just true.

She is fourteen, and she agreed to sit on the condition that I not make her look "weird." Which is a difficult promise for a painter, because what I want from a face is exactly the thing people call weird. The asymmetry, the way her chin goes slightly left when she is bored. Two hours, north light, the good linen I had been saving since March. And I held back. I did not correct anything in front of her, only drew what I saw, and when she finally stood up and went to the kitchen I spent forty minutes shifting the whole right side of the face about two millimetres. She has not seen it yet. It is better now and I am not sure I will tell her that part.

I've painted the same window in my apartment maybe forty times this year and I still don't feel like I've cracked it. Same light, same chipped frame, same view of the brick wall across the street that my landlord swears he'll repaint. When I tell people I'm a watercolor painter they think it's soft, gentle, forgiving, and then they watch me ruin the twelfth wash in a row because the paper dried too fast or the pigment settled wrong and suddenly it's not so cute anymore haha. It's not that I can't paint other things. I can. I do commissions, portraits, still lifes, whatever pays. But this window is the one I come back to at the end of the day when no one's watching, when I'm not trying to be impressive. There's something about how the light hits it at 4pm in the fall, this warm dusty gold that only lasts about twenty minutes, and every time I try to catch it I get three quarters of the way there and then lose it. My partner keeps telling me to just do a bigger version, like scale is the problem. It's not. The problem is I keep wanting it to be a photograph and it needs to be a memory instead. Anyway I had a good wash today, genuinely, one of the better ones. Thought I'd tell people who might understand the particular ache of chasing the same thing over and over and being kind of in love with the chase itself.

A young painter I teach asked me last week how you know a gallery is serious, and I gave her the boring answer I give everyone: ask who else is on the walls, and then go look at how those paintings are hung and lit. Not the website. The actual room. My own test is smaller than that. I ask what happens if a piece doesn't sell in a year. The ones who answer without flinching are the ones I trust. The ones who get vague, I file away. What's yours? The question you always ask, or the thing you look at before signing anything.

Someone asked me last week for a 30x40 cm still life, "something simple, just fruit." I quoted 1,400 euros and heard myself say it too fast, like apologising. So I sat down with the receipts, which I never do, because I knew I would not like it. Linen at 46 euros the metre, and I waste a good quarter of it cutting. The lead ground, the flake white, one tube of lapis I bought in March and have been rationing like it's medicine. Twenty-two hours at the easel, plus the sittings arranging the fruit and re-arranging it because the light moved. Framing in the rue Auguste Comte, 190. It comes out under 25 euros an hour. My student who does wedding photography gets 90. The thing is I will not go back to 900 for this size, and I know two people in this city who will do it for 600 and be happy. So the price is not really about the painting. It is about whether I want to be one of those painters. I do not. But I have been sitting on that 1,400 for three days, and I still have not sent the email.

I'll go first because fair is fair. My first real gallery came from a rejection. I sent a portfolio to a place in Annecy, heard nothing for four months, assumed it was dead. Then the owner called me because a painter had pulled out of a two-person show six weeks before the opening. She'd kept my dossier in a drawer. I said yes before she finished the sentence and spent those six weeks barely sleeping. So it wasn't a triumph, it was a hole in someone else's calendar. I've since wondered if that's how it usually goes for people, or if some of you did it the clean way with a proper approach and a plan. Tell me yours. The first one, however it happened, including if it was luck or a friend or a bar.

I pulled the last two proofs of an etching yesterday, both from the same plate, same ink, same paper, and there is a visible difference. One is a little flatter in the greys. Not a mistake exactly, just the plate giving up a bit of itself. Normally I would destroy the weaker one and keep the edition clean. But I found myself wanting to keep both, because the whole point of my work is that there is no original, and here I am quietly deciding which copy is the good one. The plate is the original. The print is the copy. Except the plate is now worn in a way the early prints are not. So the plate is also a record of everything I have done to it. I don't have a resolution for this. I just think it is funny that you can spend years arguing that authenticity is a story we tell and then get precious about one sheet of damp paper. Also I am aware this is a very comfortable problem to have, sitting in a studio in Kreuzberg with a hot plate and a stack of Fabriano. But it is genuinely the thing I keep circling. Curious if the painters here feel anything like this about the first version of a painting, or if that is a printmaker's disease.

Stone and steel here, so this might be an easier game for painters, but I'll ask anyway. I've had work turned down by galleries maybe a dozen times over the years. Not one of them ever told me why. Usually it's nothing at all, and twice it was the same line about their program not being a fit. First time I figured I was owed an explanation. Now I think a no is a no and you take it and move on. But I want to know if I'm wrong about this. Has a gallery ever given you a real reason? Something specific you could actually use, or at least argue with? Or does it always come back as program or space or timing. Mine, for whatever it's worth. The one time I got anything close, a dealer told me my piece was too heavy for her floor. Which was true, so I didn't hold it against her.

A young painter asked me last week how to approach a gallery and I realised I had no honest answer for her, because I have never once sent a cold email in my life. Every gallery I have worked with, I walked in. Literally. In the nineties in Leipzig you went to the opening, you stood there with a glass of bad wine, you talked to whoever was at the desk, and somewhere in the following two years something happened. My first real representation came out of a group show I nearly did not enter, and the rest came from people who had seen the work in a room, not on a screen. Now everyone tells me the walk-in is dead. Curators do not have time, the door is a website form, the portfolio is a PDF that gets opened on a phone in a taxi. So I want to know how it actually went for you. Did you email, or did you go in person? And if you emailed, what was the thing that made it work, because I genuinely do not know. I'm half expecting to be told I'm living in the past. Tell me.

I've had this painting facing the wall since last spring. A half figure, seated, hands in her lap. The face went fine, the light through the window went fine, and then I got to the hands and froze, because hands are where a figure painter either knows the structure or doesn't, and I knew I was bluffing. Eighteen months. I'd turn it around some evenings, look at the four grey digits sitting there like something from a mannequin factory, turn it back. Today I wiped the whole hand down with a rag and turps and started again. Two hours, no drawing on top, just building the knuckle of the index and the tendon across the back of the hand, from life, my own left hand on the arm of the chair. And it's there. Not finished, but there. The paint told me immediately what was wrong before: I'd painted the fingers as tubes. Fingers are not tubes. The knuckle is a box with a rounded top and the light breaks on it in three planes. Writing it here because I need it said out loud. Eighteen months of avoidance for two hours of work. If you have a canvas turned to the wall, that thing you keep telling yourself you'll get to when you're better, turn it around this week.

Namaste to all ji. Myself Ramesh, Mithila painter from Madhubani in Bihar. Forgive me if I am not so used to this online talking, my son has set it up for me. My first gallery, many years back, I went to Patna with three paintings rolled in cloth, no folder even, no photographs, nothing. I sat in the office and the lady there asked me, "who is your artist representative?" I did not know such a thing existed. I said, my mother is my representative, she taught me since I was six. She laughed, but kindly, and she kept one painting on the wall for a small show. That one sale fed my family that month. So I am asking: how did your very first gallery happen? Cold email, walk-in with work under the arm, a friend who knew someone, a group show you almost did not apply for? Tell me the real story, not the polished one. I want to hear how it actually went for you.

A woman with about 90k followers messaged me in March, a lifestyle account, pale interiors, very clean. She wanted to feature one of the big canvases in a video, the 180x160 one still in the studio, and her rate was €1,400. Nothing against her, she was polite and businesslike about it, which I appreciate more than the ones who offer "exposure" and a moodboard. I said I would think about it. I thought for four days. Here is the thing that decided it for me and it is not a principled thing: I could not find one painter I respect who could tell me what actually came of it. Everybody had a story about a post going well. Nobody had a story about a sale. And I am not in a position to spend €1,400 on a feeling. Maybe I got it wrong. The galleries say reach is reach. But I have watched two of my collectors find me through a bad photo on a regional culture site, so I know the route is not always the pretty one. Anyway I declined and the canvas is still here, leaning against the wall, and I am fine with it. Curious whether anyone has actually run the numbers backwards from a paid feature to money in the account, because I never got a straight answer.

I took the "oil on linen, 30x40" caption out of my posts for a month. Not the hashtags, not the process videos, just that little line at the end. I've always put it there out of habit, like a signature. Collectors want to know what they're buying, I told myself. The change was not dramatic but it was real. People started commenting about the light in the room, the mood of the thing, what the woman in the painting was thinking. Before it was mostly "beautiful work" and other painters asking about my medium. I think the technical note was giving people permission to look at it like a spec sheet instead of letting them just feel it. Once the frame of reference was gone they had to meet the painting on its own terms. I put the information back when the piece sells, obviously. But the post itself, the first encounter, I leave it bare now. The gallery can do the talking about dimensions and materials. My job on social media is to make someone stop scrolling because something in the image got under their skin, and I was undercutting that with my own footnotes. Maybe that's just me. Or maybe we all over-explain ourselves online because we're afraid of being misunderstood, and the fear itself is what keeps people at arm's length.

Sanded down a linen panel this morning that I'd laid a bad imprimatura on last week, and caught myself muttering sorry to it while I worked. As if the panel had feelings. As if I hadn't made it ugly myself in the first place. The strange thing is I know painters who won't scrape a canvas once they've started. They'd rather paint over a dead layer than admit two days went nowhere. I used to be one of them. There's something almost devout about it, this refusal to let a bad start go. But honestly the sanding is often where the painting gets saved. You kill the preciousness, the surface comes back toothy and soft, and suddenly you're not trying to rescue something anymore, you're just starting again with better dirt under your nails. My daughter watched me do it and asked why I didn't just buy a fresh panel. And I didn't have a good answer that wasn't sentimental. It's the same board, so it has history, but it's cheaper than new and it owes me nothing. I think I just like the ritual of it. The erasing. Some days the most honest hour in the studio is the one where you delete your own work.

I painted a new interior last month, spent six weeks on it, thought it was the best thing I'd done in years. Put it up next to a study I did in 2019, the one where the light was wrong and I nearly scraped it down. Guess which one sold in three days. It's not the first time. Almost every buyer who writes me mentions a painting from five or eight years ago. I should be grateful, and I am, but there's a part of me that wonders if people want the maker they already know, not the one I'm becoming. Or maybe the old ones are just more honest. A painter's early work has a hunger the comfortable work doesn't. I keep telling myself the new one will find its person. In the meantime it's propped against the studio wall and I catch myself glaring at it while I clean brushes.

I still think about the first gallery I almost had. Small spot, owned by an older painter who actually knew how to hang work and talk to clients. I was young, blew the meeting by being nervous and trying too hard. Never got a second shot. Anyone else got one that slipped through their fingers? Or did you dodge a bullet and not know it at the time.