Search

submitted to a group show two months ago. paid the entry fee, formatted everything exactly to their specs, sent it off. heard nothing. figured that's how it goes. yesterday i get an email, clearly meant for someone internal, that says "mira's work isn't quite right for the curatorial vision, we're going to pass." fine, whatever. but then at the bottom there's a note from one of them to the other: "did we ever actually open her portfolio? i think the link expired." so they didn't even look. charged me $35 to not open a link. and then had the nerve to accidentally send me the proof. i'm not even mad about the rejection. i'm mad about the $35 and the pretending. just say you picked who you already knew and move on.

ok real question. everyone talks about the polite email, the cold open call, the submission portal that eats your soul. but has anyone ever gotten in somewhere sideways? i'll go first. i got my first group show because i was standing in the gallery trying to decide if i even wanted to submit and the owner came out and asked if i needed help. i was so flustered i just pointed at a piece on the wall and said "i could make that better." absolute foot in mouth. she laughed, told me to prove it, and i brought something in two days later. still don't know if that was confidence or sheer stupidity but it worked. so what's yours? walked in with a piece under your arm? slid into their DMs? emailed so many times they finally answered just to shut you up?

I once sent a portfolio to a small gallery in Warsaw and they said no, politely, but no. And you know what? I was actually okay with it. The process of preparing the submission, getting my slides organised, writing the artist statement, it made me look at my own work properly for the first time. So even the no taught me something. Anyone else have a rejection that ended up being useful somehow? Or am I just trying to make myself feel better 😅

I landed my first real gallery show because an older sculptor I'd done fabrication for put my name in front of the owner. Didn't ask for it, barely even knew it happened until the call came. Never had to do the cold pitch. So I never learned how. Now I'm watching people grind out submissions and wondering if that even works anymore. Did anyone here get a gallery the hard way, actually going after it? Or did it mostly come through somebody's recommendation or just being around long enough? Tell me if I'm wrong, but I think the word-of-mouth route still beats the cold email every time.

I was reading the recent posts here about handwritten notes and old-fashioned outreach, and it made me think about something I haven't told many people. Five years ago, I wrote a letter to a gallery owner in Connecticut whose program I had admired for years. Not an email. A letter. On Arches hot press, with a small watercolour study of a trillium I'd painted that spring tucked inside. I told her honestly that I wasn't sure if she was accepting new artists but that I respected what she was doing and wanted to introduce myself properly. She wrote back. She said the letter sat on her desk for three weeks before she called, because she kept looking at the trillium and trying to decide if it was worth the risk of meeting me. She took me on. That gallery remains the steadiest source of my serious sales. Not Instagram. Not my website. A letter. I don't think the lesson is that we should all be sending letters. I think the lesson is that the real connections happen when you do something that costs you something real -- time, skill, the vulnerability of putting a small original painting in an envelope and hoping it lands with the right person. It is harder to ignore than a form submission. I still send a letter occasionally when a connection matters to me. I have never once regretted it. I have regretted the polished emails I overthought and never sent.

I'm a chronic email-er, which honestly took me forever to even get comfortable with. But last fall I was in a town with one gallery I'd been chasing online for like a year, and I figured why not just... walk in. I brought three small pieces in a tote bag and asked the woman at the desk if she had two minutes. She was so nice about it, looked at everything, kept one for their submissions pile, and I basically floated out of there. And then I never did it again because the idea of doing it a second time makes me want to crawl out of my skin haha. So genuine question for the people who DO the walk-in thing regularly: how?? Do you book it ahead or just show up? Do you bring work or just talk? And has it ever actually turned into something, or is it more of a warm-up for the email later? I need to know if I'm missing out by hiding behind my keyboard forever.

Everyone tells you the first one is the hardest. Mine came through a friend of a friend who owned a small bookshop that also hung prints on the back wall. No formal thing, no submission. She just saw a pile of my blue prints drying on a table and said bring them over. That was it. I wonder how often it's like that, sideways, accidental, someone who just sees the work. Not a cold email that finally got answered. Or maybe some of you did it properly and that's the story. How did your first gallery actually come about?

I got my first gallery by walking in off the street with a portfolio case, which today people act like I'm confessing to something embarrassing. But I walked in, asked if I could show the director my work, she had ten minutes between meetings, and she took me on. I know it's not the usual way now, everything is email, submissions, Instagram DMs. But I also know artists who've done it recently and it worked. So I'm asking: did you ever just walk into a gallery cold and get somewhere with it? Or is that completely dead and I'm just old? Me: Lyon, 2008, walked into a small gallery in the 1st, came back three days later with paintings. Stayed with them five years.

I'm preparing to reach out to a few galleries and I'm wondering about the best approach. Cold emailing feels efficient, but I've also heard some curators prefer a studio visit or a physical submission. Is a well-crafted email enough to get your foot in the door these days, or is it usually a waste of time without a personal connection or prior introduction? I'm curious about your experiences.

Started a new piece three weeks ago and it's still sitting there looking like a corpse. Charcoal and torn paper, which normally I can work fast on, but something about it just won't click. The composition is fine. The values are fine. Every individual part of it is fine and the whole thing is dead. I keep circling it like it owes me money. Added a wash over one corner yesterday just to break the boredom and now it's worse. I know the fix is probably to just let it sit and work on something else for a while, but I've never been good at that. I want to wrestle it into submission and it's not cooperating. Anyone else hit this wall where the piece is technically okay and that's exactly the problem? Not bad enough to scrap, not good enough to live with. What do you do with those?

Working on a little 8x10 of a pear on a blue cloth for a craft fair submission this weekend. It's my third painting this week and I think I cooked it. The highlights on the pear started out nice and soft and I kept messing with them and now it looks like it's made of plastic. The cloth is okay but the whole thing just feels... tight. Like I sucked the life out of it by trying too hard. I know the answer is probably "put the brush down and walk away" but has anyone actually gotten better at knowing when a piece is done? Or is it always this guessing game of is it finished or did I just ruin it?

I still remember mine. Berlin, maybe ten years ago. A small space I'd been following for months, I sent a proper portfolio, real prints in hand, even went in person. The gallerist looked at my etchings maybe ten seconds and said "this is very academic" in a way that was clearly not a compliment. I was crushed for weeks. But honestly? That rejection made me rethink everything about how I presented the work. Not the work itself, I kept that, but I stopped sending this heavy theoretical text with every submission, stopped trying to sound like I belonged in a catalogue before anyone had seen a single print. Next space I approached I just showed the images and talked like a person. They took me on that summer. So now I wonder: is everyone's worst rejection the thing that actually fixed their approach? Or did some of you get your break in spite of never having that humbling moment? What did your first no actually change for you?